John Cleese will make a formal complaint to the BBC about the “deception, dishonesty and tone” of a recent interview he had given.
The Monty Python star claimed the interviewer had tried to portray him as “old-fashioned, uncaring and basically harmful” and had not discussed the agreed on topics.
Mr Cleese walked out of the interview after being asked about cancel culture, the pandemic and Dave Chapelle.
John Cleese walks out of BBC interview
“I just did an interview with BBC World Asia. It was to talk about the shows I’m doing in Singapore and Bangkok,” he wrote in a Twitter thread.
“Instead, the interviewer, whose name was, I think, Karishma, started by asking me questions about Cancel Culture.
“I replied courteously and in full I explained that if parents were over protective, it did not prepare children well when they entered the real and often not-very-nice world.
“She then asked a disjointed question, clearly trying to portray me as old-fashioned, uncaring and basically harmful.”
Cleese said his response had been “totally ignored” by the interviewer, who had then asked him about the ongoing pandemic and Dave Chapelle.
The media will no doubt report that I 'stormed out'
— John Cleese (@JohnCleese) December 16, 2021
I didn't
Nor did I lose my temper
But I was depressed that this kind of presenter-ego crap is so prevalent now
“I removed my headphones, saying. that this was not the interview I had agreed to,” he said.
John Cleese’s BBC complaint
“So I am formally complaining to the BBC about the deception, dishonesty and tone of this interview. Karishma had no interest in a discussion with me.
“She wanted only the role of prosecutor. The BBC needs to train her again.”
He added: “The media will no doubt report that I ‘stormed out.’ I didn’t. Nor did I lose my temper.
“But I was depressed that this kind of presenter-ego crap is so prevalent now.”
Last month the comedian “blacklisted himself” from the Cambridge Union debating society after a historian who impersonated Adolf Hitler during a society debate was banned.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel