Lord Alan Sugar has ordered The Apprentice to “tone down” its interview round in future series, after finding this year’s episode “hard” to watch.
The BBC business reality show faced criticism this year when the contestants were reduced to tears after their gruelling grillings from Claude Littner, Mike Soutar, Linda Plant and Baroness Karren Brady, and the 75-year-old mogul admitted he agreed with the backlash.
He told The Times magazine: "I think we need to tone that down a bit. I found it hard to watch. Unfortunately, when that was recorded I wasn’t there.
"Anyway, I’m not making any excuses. When I saw it in the end I thought this is too harsh, and we’re going to tone it down now.
“I don’t think it’s entertaining. It used to be entertaining. All the previous boardroom [episode] 11s were entertaining. This one was very harsh.
“I’ve told them now. Believe me, it won’t be happening again.”
But Lord Sugar revealed Karren - who is one of the two people to advise him every week on the programme - insisted she was made to look "hard" in the edit and blamed the production company for making things seem worse than they were.
He added: "I said to Karren, ‘You are very hard.’ She said, ‘No, it was the way I was edited. I was very nice, very polite, and it was like give and take.’
"What went wrong here was the production company went bang, bang, bang — only wanted to deal with bang, bang, bang moments.”
A man hasn't won the show since 2017, when James White and Sarah Lynn were declared joint winners, and Alan believes the female contestants have proven to be more "sharp" than their male counterparts.
He said: “I don’t know. The women are focused. The women are clever. They’re sharp. The blokes weren’t. It’s as simple as that.”
And the business guru insisted he never thinks about diversity when hiring candidates.
He said: "Not really, no. I don’t care about all that. I choose the person that can get the job done best. I don’t care who they are, what they are, what they look like and where they’re from.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel