Big Brother's Jordan has been candid with fellow housemates after sharing details of his relationship with his father.
Discussing his father, he shared that they hadn't spoken in many years and described him as a "retired heroin addict".
Chatting with Matty and Trish, they asked what Jordan meant by a "retired heroin addict", as the lawyer shared his father had passed away ten years ago.
The two fellow housemates were unsure how to take Jordan's dry sense of humour but he reassured them that it was okay and they never really shared a relationship.
Big Brother's Jordan shares details of 'tragic' relationship with his father
Many Big Brother viewers took to X, formally Twitter to show their support towards Jordan.
As one said: "Bless Jordan, he was definitely trying to steer away to not get emotional."
Another Big Brother viewer shared: "If you couldn't love Jordan anymore after that!"
One even called for Jordan to have his own show saying "Can we not get Jordan his own show!"
Me, an introvert, when I get 5 seconds of confidence on a night out ✨ #BBUK pic.twitter.com/gsMpgPajBA
— Big Brother UK (@bbuk) October 26, 2023
Who is up for eviction in week three of Big Brother?
This week, housemates Dylan, Hallie and Trish all face the public vote ahead of Friday night’s third live eviction of the series.
Trish received five nominations from Dylan, Jenkin, Kerry, Paul and Tom, making her the most nominated.
Meanwhile, Dylan gained four nominations from Kerry, Noky, Olivia and Trish.
Lastly, Hallie also received four nominations from Chanelle, Jenkin, Jordan and Tom.
However, one nominated housemate was originally not up for eviction but following a rule break, was forced to face the public vote.
Fan favourite Yinrun broke a Big Brother rule after discussing nominations, meaning her nominations for Hallie and Kerry were revoked, ultimately leading to Dylan facing the public vote alongside Hallie and Trish.
Friday night will see either Dylan, Hallie or Trish be evicted from the Big Brother house.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel