When the Post Office/Horizon ITV drama starring Toby Jones aired in January, there was a huge public backlash.
Jones starred as Alan Bates, who along with his partner Suzanne Sercombe used all his savings to buy a Post Office branch in Llandudno, North Wales.
Their life - and that of many others - is turned upside down when the new computer system called Horizon is installed in branches across the country.
As a result of errors in the technology, numerous postmasters were wrongly prosecuted between 1999 and 2015 after being accused of fraud, theft and false accounting.
How utterly abysmal…
— Marina Purkiss (@MarinaPurkiss) January 8, 2024
That it took an ITV drama to for the police to launch a criminal investigation into the Post Office scandal. pic.twitter.com/hMnmk673XU
Since Mr Bates Vs The Post Office was broadcast 50 new potential victims have approached lawyers.
The Post Office is wholly owned by the Government and a public inquiry into Horizon is ongoing.
Speaking during a visit to Oxford on Sunday, the Prime Minister said the UK Government was “keen to do everything we can because this was appalling” and should “never have happened”.
What is the Post Office Horizon IT scandal all about?
Between 1999 and 2015 the Post Office relentlessly pursued operators of sub-post offices across the UK for alleged theft, fraud and false accounting based on information from its Horizon IT system installed in the late 1990s.
That was despite knowing that from at least 2010 onwards there were faults in the centralised accounting software.
In total, about 3,500 branch owner-operators were wrongly accused of taking money from their businesses, with more than 700 prosecuted by the Post Office despite protesting their innocence and raising issues with the software in their defence.
The scandal is frequently described as the most widespread miscarriage of justice in UK history.
If the #Horizon failure had happened after social media took off I wonder if Post Office would have got away with its persecution of SPMs for so long? Would they have managed to mislead people into believing they were the only ones experiencing discrepancies?
— Richard Coles (@RevRichardColes) January 8, 2024
What harm did it cause?
Hundreds of sub-post office operators ended up with criminal records and punishments ranging from having to do community service and wear electronic tags to being jailed. Many were left struggling financially or even bankrupt following convictions. Even those who did not go to court had to drum up money to cover nonexistent shortfalls.
Victims and their families were severely hit by stress and in many cases illness, with the scandal linked to at least four suicides.
For years the Post Office, which has the power to investigate and prosecute without the need for police involvement, continued to defend itself against accusations and press reports highlighting problems with the IT system, developed by Japan’s Fujitsu, including through legal means.
In 2019, a group of post office operators won a high court case in which their convictions were ruled wrongful and the Horizon IT system was ruled to be at fault. In 2021, the ruling was upheld on appeal, quashing the convictions of some workers who were wrongly accused of committing crimes, paving the way for compensation.
It is good to see the media finally highlighting the Post Office scandal. We called for Vennells to be striped of her honour years ago. Nobody was interested in reporting it.
— CWU (@CWUnews) January 8, 2024
As we expose injustice we must also look at the media failing to be a voice for those who need it. https://t.co/eeI2Bmdf7k
However, even since the computer system was found to be defective, the Post Office has still opposed several appeals by operators.
What about those who pursued the prosecutions?
To date, no Post Office staff have been punished for the scandal. On Friday, the Metropolitan police confirmed for the first time that the Post Office is under criminal investigation over “potential fraud offences” committed during the scandal.
The Met is already investigating two former Fujitsu experts, who were witnesses in the trials, for perjury and perverting the course of justice.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel