Alan Bates and bosses of the Post Office and Fujitsu are set to be questioned by MPs today.
The long-running battle for justice accelerated dramatically after the public outcry provoked by the ITV drama Mr Bates Vs The Post Office.
Bates, the campaigning former subpostmaster on whom the series centred, said ahead of the committee hearing that his focus was on pushing for swift compensation for the victims.
He told Sky News: “I have one concern, and it’s to get the compensation right, that’s it."
On Tuesday, we're looking at how fair, full and fast compensation can be paid to sub-postmasters in the Post Office Horizon Scandal.
— Business and Trade Committee (@CommonsBTC) January 11, 2024
We'll be questioning:
- Former sub-postmasters
- Post Office
- Fujitsu
- Minister Kevin Hollinrake MP
Find out more: https://t.co/cBEtlIJyZp pic.twitter.com/RwksRcqGtC
The Commons’ Business and Trade Committee will examine what more can be done to deliver compensation for victims of what has been labelled one of the worst miscarriages of justice in British history.
Nick Read, chief executive of the Post Office, and Paul Patterson, Europe director at Fujitsu, are both due to appear.
The Horizon scandal saw more than 700 subpostmasters and subpostmistresses handed criminal convictions after Fujitsu’s faulty Horizon software made it appear as though money was missing at their branches.
The Government has been scrambling to exonerate them and pay out compensation to those affected.
Bates: “They should be moving heaven and earth to get it done and get it done fast"
Mr Bates, as well as wrongfully-convicted former subpostmistress Jo Hamilton, are set to give evidence from 10.30am, followed by Mr Read and Mr Patterson from 11.30am.
Kevin Hollinrake, the Post Office minister who has argued that Post Office figures found responsible for the scandal should be jailed, is to appear at noon.
MPs will interrogate what Fujitsu and the Post Office knew about problems with the Horizon system and when.
The role played by Fujitsu will also come under the microscope when the Post Office Horizon IT inquiry returns on Tuesday.
The probe is set to hear evidence from staff at the technology giant who assisted the Post Office with prosecutions.
In 2009, S4C current affairs series ‘Taro 9’ interviewed Alan Bates about the Post Office scandal.
— Owen Williams 🏴 (@OwsWills) January 13, 2024
While lesser known, Welsh-medium broadcaster S4C was *way* ahead of the curve. His excoriating interview is worth digesting.
Get the full story on iPlayer.pic.twitter.com/2An1HgsQaW
Rajbinder Sangha, a former member of Fujitsu’s fraud and litigation support office, is due to face questions from the public inquiry’s counsel.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak last week announced that the wrongly prosecuted in England and Wales could have their names cleared by the end of the year under fast-tracked legislation after growing pressure to take more serious action.
Those whose convictions are quashed are eligible for a £600,000 compensation payment, while Mr Sunak offered £75,000 to subpostmasters involved in group legal action against the Post Office.
The Prime Minister has faced calls to go further and bar Fujitsu from securing Government contracts and pursuing the firm for compensation payments.
The Horizon software started to be rolled out in Post Office branches across the UK in 1999 and over the subsequent years, a series of subpostmasters were prosecuted over missing funds.
In 2019 the High Court ruled that Horizon contained several “bugs, errors and defects” and there was a “material risk” that shortfalls in Post Office branch accounts were caused by the system.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel