Martin Lewis has written to Chancellor Jeremy Hunt asking him to take action in his upcoming budget and tackle the issue of mid-contract broadband and mobile price rises.
The Money Saving Expert warned the Chancellor that customers with BT, EE, TalkTalk, Three and Vodafone all face rises of around 8% in April.
In his letter, Mr Lewis addressed the lifetime ISA penalty hitting young first time buyers, unfair Child Benefit rules penalising single income families, and substantial real term cuts to student living loans.
He also challenged the Chancellor to tackle mid-contract price rises.
The budget is just 6 weeks away. Today I sent the Chancellor, @Jeremy_Hunt a letter, on his request, to ask that he fixes:
— Martin Lewis (@MartinSLewis) January 22, 2024
- Unfair Child Benefit rules penalising single income families
- The Lifetime ISA penalty hitting young 1st time buyers
- Above inflation mid-contract… pic.twitter.com/ZVIt00Cq1p
Mr Lewis said: “You have spent the past year focused on reducing inflation. Yet the policies of telecoms providers are both inflationary and anti-competitive.
“They bake into their contracts 3% or 4% above-inflation price hikes each year, which is, by definition, inflationary in its own right.
“Last April, the rise was 17% - now we’ve just learnt December’s inflation figures, which most base their rises on, meaning BT, EE, TalkTalk, Three and Vodafone have all just confirmed huge rises of around 8% for April 2024.
“Worse, this impacts those who are locked in the middle of their contracts, so cannot take advantage of the competitive market to ditch and switch.
“While Ofcom is consulting on proposals to only allow mid-contract rises laid out in pounds and pence in advance, that still allows above-inflation rises.
“Whereas best practice, if rises are to be allowed, is to have that system, but with an override saying it cannot be more than inflation.
“You kindly said you’d write to the Competition and Markets Authority about this if I presented evidence. I’ve enclosed info and date on this of mine, and additional evidence from Which?”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel