Harry Potter author JK Rowling has criticized some of her 'despicable' former colleagues in a new book.
She made scathing comments about former colleagues in an exclusive extract from her upcoming book, The Women Who Wouldn’t Wheesht.
Rowling has faced criticism for her comments regarding the transgender community, with Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson among those who showed unwavering support for the community in response.
The extract has been has been shared with The Times.
This article features an extract from an essay I contributed to a book written by those on the frontline of the fight for women's rights in Scotland. For my full essay and over 30 others, buy 'The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht', which is published tomorrow.https://t.co/wrhWT1UKgJ
— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) May 29, 2024
More recently, Rowling indicated she would not forgive the actors for their stance, and said they could 'save their apologies'.
Radcliffe, meanwhile, has said the distance between himself and the woman who created Harry Potter now makes him 'sad'.
Speaking to The Atlantic, he said: "Jo, obviously Harry Potter would not have happened without her, so nothing in my life would have probably happened the way it is without that person.
“But that doesn’t mean that you owe the things you truly believe to someone else for your entire life.”
"Those appalled by my position often fail to grasp how truly despicable I find theirs"
Now, Rowling has revealed that the opinions of some of her former colleagues were not all that 'surprising' to her.
She claimed that people she'd previously worked with 'rushed to distance themselves' from her in the wake of her controversial comments, 'or to add their public condemnation of my blasphemous views'.
Rowling added that 'many former and current colleagues have been staunchly supportive' of her, but went on to claim that the more shocking outcome of the situation was how some of her old co-workers still wanted to be 'friends' afterwards.
She wrote: "In truth, the condemnation of certain individuals was far less surprising to me than the fact that some of them then emailed me, or sent messages through third parties, to check that we were still friends."
"The thing is, those appalled by my position often fail to grasp how truly despicable I find theirs," she continued.
Recommended reading:
JK Rowling calls out Oxford MP for her definition of women
JK Rowling regrets not speaking out ‘far sooner’ on trans rights
JK Rowling slams Harry Potter stars in explosive X rant
"I’ve watched “no debate” become the slogan of those who once posed as defenders of free speech. I’ve witnessed supposedly progressive men arguing that women don’t exist as an observable biological class and don’t deserve biology-based rights.
"I’ve listened as certain female celebrities insist that there isn’t the slightest risk to women and girls in allowing any man who self-identifies as a woman to enter single-sex spaces reserved for women, including changing rooms, bathrooms or rape shelters."
"Better that a hundred women who aren’t up to speed with the latest gender jargon miss public health information than that one trans-identified individual feels invalidated, seems to be the view," Rowling concluded.
If you’ve been affected by any of these issues contact the LGBT national hotline at 888-843-4564, available Monday to Friday 4pm-12am ET and 12pm-5pm ET on Saturdays.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel