Should Strictly Come Dancing come to an end? That was the question being debated on Good Morning Britain (GMB) today (Tuesday, July 16) following controversies with professional dancers on the show.
The ITV morning show saw Richard Madeley, Kate Garraway, Neev Spencer and Stephanie Takyi discuss the topic.
This was after pro dancer Graziano Di Prima was dramatically dropped from the line-up for the 2024 series despite being confirmed to return last month.
It’s been claimed Di Prima’s departure followed unspecified allegations made by those working on the show who had observed Di Prima’s rehearsals with TV star Zara McDermott, whom he was partnered with on the 2023 series, The Independent reports.
Di Prima released a statement on Instagram, saying: “I deeply regret the events that led to my departure from Strictly. My intense passion and determination to win might have affected my training regime.
“While respecting the BBC HR process, I acknowledge it’s only right for the sake of the show that I step away. I am saddened that I wasn’t allowed to offer a quote to the online news stories, and I take on board the sensitivity of the situation.”
Alongside that, a controversy emerged with Giovanni Pernice who was paired up with actress Amanda Abbington on last year's series.
Just five weeks into the competition, Abbington abruptly pulled out on medical grounds, and then in January, she revealed she had been diagnosed with mild PTSD.
Reports claimed she’d requested rehearsal footage and was seeking legal advice, and a few months later Pernice released a lengthy statement on Instagram.
He said that he “reject[ed] any suggestion of abusive or threatening behaviour” and that he “look[ed] forward to clearing [his] name”.
When the Strictly pro-line-up was confirmed a few weeks later, Pernice was not on the list.
Strictly Comes Dancing is a show known for its warmth and the question GMB debated was if it had lost its sparkle due to the controversies and should come to an end.
Should Strictly Come Dancing end?
Broadcaster Spencer made the claim that Strictly hadn't been the same since Bruse Forsyth stopped hosting and that the show had become a "media vehicle for gossip instead of it being about talent".
Meanwhile, journalist Takyi said it was mainly a "feel-good" show that has always had its controversies and argued that "the mistakes of two dancers" shouldn't impact the entire production.
The debate continued into the GMB comments of an X (formerly Twitter) post where a poll was listed asking for people's opinions on the topic.
Professional dancer Graziano Di Prima who has left Strictly following claims of ‘gross misconduct’ towards his dance partner Zara McDermott. In the last few minutes, Zara has spoken out in a statement.
— Good Morning Britain (@GMB) July 16, 2024
So has Strictly had it's last dance? @neevkspencer & Stephanie Takyi debate pic.twitter.com/trb2GeI4tb
There were some mixed views, with one person writing: "Strictly is a vile programme with terrible presenters and egotistical dancers. Ditch it!"
Meanwhile, another shared: "No! The "celebs" who are going on there now think they are going for an easy ride and some screen time, all of a sudden they then realise it is actually bloody hard work and cry my dance partner is working me to [sic] hard and shouting at me!"
Recommended reading:
- Strictly’s Graziano Di Prima axed from BBC show and ‘deeply regrets’ actions
- BBC Strictly Come Dancing legend to return after two-year hiatus
- Strictly Come Dancing legend says show was ‘brutal awakening’
One commented that these incidents shouldn't take away from the rest of the work done by the crew to bring the show together.
They said: "It’s unfortunate that this very small cloud is pulling focus away from a truly magical show. There are still 100s of people who work so hard on the show. It will be back bigger and stronger than ever."
On the other hand, some people shared they were simply bored of Strictly, with one posting: "I think it's had it's time now. Running out of celebrities same as Dancing on Ice. I used to love both those programmes but don't bother watching them anymore."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel