Thousands of drivers are risking a £100 fine and three penalty points on their licence every time they drive on the motorway.
More than 53,000 incidents of drivers ignoring lane closed signs on smart motorways have been recorded since 2021, new research has found.
Road safety charity IAM RoadSmart, which conducted the study, said it demonstrates the Government must give “serious thought” about the future of the roads.
Adherence to red X signs is critical to safety on smart motorways which had their hard shoulder converted into a live running lane.
Common speed camera myths
National Highways staff switch on the closed lane signs when stopped vehicles are detected in live lanes to prevent them being hit from behind and to help and protect the emergency services.
Since September 2022, all police forces have been able to use enforcement cameras to prosecute motorists who illegally pass under a red X or enter a lane beyond one of the signs.
This can result in a fine of up to £100 and three penalty points, or more severe penalties and a court appearance in some cases.
Figures obtained by IAM RoadSmart following Freedom of Information requests to police forces revealed 4,393 incidents were recorded in 2021, rising to 20,773 in 2022 and 28,231 in 2023.
Meera Naran, whose eight-year-old son Dev died in a smart motorway crash on the M6 near Birmingham in May 2018, said: “In an emergency, every second counts.
“The red X provides a layer of safety for the public, emergency services, recovery operators and road workers.
“An incident can occur on any lane of the motorway and lanes are closed for a number of reasons.
“When in operation and abided by, this could save a number of lives, including your own.”
What can fail an MOT test?
IAM RoadSmart director of policy and standards Nicholas Lyes said: “Ignoring a red X sign on a smart motorway is dangerous because it risks a serious collision and, for this reason, we welcome police forces clamping down on those who break the law.
“The majority of drivers have serious reservations about the safety of smart motorways where the hard shoulder has been removed, and these figures are unlikely to persuade them they are safe.
“We know that no new all-lane running smart motorways will be built but it does beg the question of what we do with the existing stretches that are in operation?
“This is something the new Government needs to give some serious thought to.”
Smart motorways without a hard shoulder were created to increase capacity at a lower cost than widening roads.
Then-prime minister Rishi Sunak cancelled all future planned smart motorway projects in April last year, citing financial pressures and a lack of public confidence in the roads.
This led to calls for the hard shoulder to be reinstated on existing smart motorways.
A National Highways spokesperson said: “A Red X signal is there to increase the safety of everyone using the road by highlighting an issue ahead.
“Above 90% of drivers observe Red X signals, but ignoring Red X signals is an offence and puts themselves and others at risk.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel