The High Court has ruled that using the word 'bald' against a man could be considered sexual harassment, which has caused some disbelief among some social media users.
It follows a lengthy legal case brought by electrician Tony Finn who claimed he had been sexually harassed by his boss during a heated row in 2019.
Mr Finn, 64, made the claim against the British Bung Company, where he worked as an electrician for 24 years before he was fired in 2021.
He said he was a victim of sexual harassment after comments were made about his baldness, including being called a "stupid bald c***" by his supervisor during an argument, LBC reports.
The High Court’s ruled that “banter” about being bald is sex-related harassment.
— BBC Radio 5 Live (@bbc5live) October 11, 2024
Around 6.5m UK men experience baldness.
How’s it affected you?@NickyAACampbell asks: baldness, banter and you? pic.twitter.com/XW1tfUCORq
The three-person employment tribunal panel said the remark "crossed a line" and dismissed an argument that the comment was not sexist because women can be bald too.
LBC adds: "The judgement said there was "a connection between the word 'bald'" and "the protected characteristic of sex", noting that it is "much more prevalent in men than women".
The panel, led by Judge Jonathan Brain, added: "We find it inherently related to sex."
The debate over the ruling was discussed online after BBC Radio 5 Live posted to their X (formerly known as Twitter) account regarding the ruling.
They wrote: "The High Court’s ruled that “banter” about being bald is sex-related harassment. Around 6.5m UK men experience baldness. How’s it affected you? @NickyAACampbell asks: baldness, banter and you?"
'It's silly' - Social media users react to High Court ruling
Several X users replied to the BBC Radio 5 Live post, with some being in disbelief over the issue.
One person wrote: "This is silly. We should all strive to be better people and to be more understanding and supportive with those who are missing something. But it seems silly to waste the court's time with things so small."
Another described it as "Utter nonsense" whilst another said: "This cannot be serious?!"
Recommended reading:
- Government update on Winter Fuel Payment cuts as legal bid to overturn launched
- DVLA £1,000 warning to 3.6 million drivers who passed their test before 2015
- UK households could be due £170 TV Licence refund - are you eligible?
Meanwhile, one posted: "I’m bald, I love being bald. I really feel for guys who struggle with it. I have no issue with people having banter as long as they can take it back."
Some made light of the debate, with one person writing: "Darts players across the land rejoice."
Another shared: "Coconut bonce, eggshell, cueball, lightbulb and slaphead......all that just from the Mrs. We demand justice lad."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel