Nearly half of singles feel pressure display their financial status on a date, according to new research.
Exactly 46% admit they feel obliged to demonstrated how much money they have - potentially leading them to spend beyond their means.
The findings also revealed that dining out at restaurants leads the pack as the preferred date activity, chosen by 40% of respondents, followed by drinks at a bar or pub (14%), and movie outings (9%).
However, a notable shift toward simpler, less expensive activities is emerging, with 9% of people choosing scenic walks and another 9% enjoying coffee dates as their go-to options.
The research from NatWest also showed that many of the 2,000 people surveyed (43%), spending between £50-£100 on a date is the norm, but some respondents (2%) admitted splurging up to £200 to woo their potential partners.
Surprisingly, the research showed that the older generation (55-64 year olds) is most likely to split the bill (45%), compared with 34% of 18-34 year olds, perhaps suggesting that those who are older are more cautious of their spending when it comes to love.
Nearly half (46%) of daters admit they feel the need to project financial security and the trend for high spending on dates raises questions about financial pressure and how it influences relationship dynamics.
NatWest’s Sandi Royden said: “The excitement of dating someone new could lead to impulse spending or the urge to impress with lavish outings.
“But it’s essential to set realistic financial boundaries early on. There are plenty of creative and cost-effective date ideas that are fun and don’t have to break the bank—whether it’s a walk in the park, a home-cooked meal, or exploring free local cultural events.
“Being upfront and honest about your financial boundaries can help pave the way for a healthier, more transparent relationship. True romance doesn’t have to come with a price tag.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here