A finance worker who claims she suffered second degree burns when her microneedling session went wrong is warning people to research clinicians carefully before getting beauty treatments.
Melia Nielsen had been visiting a clinic for months to receive chemical peels while battling her spots but then had £75 microneedling to treat her acne scars in July in a bid to feel more 'confident'.
However the 24-year-old claims her clinician started ignoring her messages when the 'entirety' of her left cheek swelled up and became 'horrible' and 'purple' - so was forced to dash to A&E.
Doctors reportedly confirmed it was a chemical burn and the payroll officer was forced to endure months of 'soreness' and has been left with a 'huge scar'.
Microneedling is a cosmetic procedure that uses tiny, sterile needles to puncture the skin to promote smoothness and toning.
Melia shared the horrifying photos documenting her ordeal on social media and claimed the burns were the result of 'incorrect methods by the practitioner'.
She is now speaking out to urge others to 'make sure to thoroughly research, have consultations and choose your skincare wisely' to avoid anyone else suffering the same fate.
Melia, from Grimsby, Lincolnshire, said: "While she was doing it she was going over and over that same area to a point that it actually wore away the first one or two layers of my skin. So then it was essentially raw skin.
"At the time she never said anything about it but I was actually bleeding. She only said five or six days later over a message that she'd noticed that I was bleeding quite a bit.
"Because I was bleeding she was cleaning the area with, I don't know if it was a toner or something, but it burned that brand new, raw skin.
"Afterwards there was a little patch in the middle where it wasn't red, it was white. She just said to me to keep an eye on it and don't use anything harsh on it.
"By the time I'd driven home, that patch of my face was weeping. I was like 'surely this isn't normal'. I was panicking the night that it happened. I washed it with water and didn't put anything on it."
She revealed she took herself to A&E the next morning after her injury had worsened and she discovered it was a chemical burn.
Melia said: "They confirmed it was a chemical burn. They gave me this water-based cream that I had to apply every hour for 10 days.
"Thankfully it didn't get infected but they did say if the swelling hadn't gone down after a couple of days I'd have to go back because it could be infected.
"They said what should've happened at the time is if she thought something wasn't right she shouldn't have carried on doing what she was doing. She shouldn't have let me leave with my skin the way it was."
The customer admitted she regrets getting the £75 cosmetic procedure as she 'didn't really need it' and it will 'never fully go away' leaving her struggling to apply makeup.
Melia said: "It was painful. It was so sore for weeks. It was itchy, it was swollen, it was horrible.
"It was hard to go to work that Monday. When I woke up on Monday my face was so swollen it was all purple. It was horrible.
"I didn't want to not go to work because of it but also I didn't want to face people because I was in a front facing job. I didn't want people coming in and asking questions.
"Even now if I rub my finger over it now it's a completely different texture to the rest of my face. It's never fully going away.
"The first time I put makeup on was only about a month ago. Because it's such a sensitive area now, even wearing makeup for a day really made it flare up."
The ordeal has permanently put her off cosmetic procedures and she now urges other people to do their research first.
Melia said: "I just want people to actually look into the background of who is doing things like that."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel