Strictly Come Dancing fans have said not giving Lauren Oakley a dance partner this season has been the "worst decision" by BBC bosses.
Lauren, who was filling in for Amy Dowden, danced with JLS star JB Gill during Icon Week.
The coupling danced to a selection of Bruno Mars songs and received an outstanding score of 39 from the judges.
Fans were quick to praise the performance on X, formerly Twitter, with one viewer writing: "Not giving Lauren a partner was the worst decision this year. She is fantastic to watch!"
Another said: "As much as I love Amy I find Lauren’s choreography refreshing and a lot better."
A third added: "I think Lauren was probably more suited to that dance than Amy would have been, so a good week for a temporary partner."
Chris McCausland reveals how he turned down extra help on Strictly Come Dancing
This comes after Chris McCausland revealed that he turned down extra assistance from Strictly Come Dancing bosses.
He said that his first performance on the BBC show came with "a lot of nerves" and that he was "worried" that he may not be able to dance.
Because of this, bosses were willing to make some reasonable changes to help him.
He said: "They did offer me and say 'Would you like us to ask the audience to be quiet while you're dancing so it doesn't affect you?'"
Recommended Reading:
Strictly to mark 'icons' in brand new themed week as Amy Dowden misses show
Strictly's JB Gill breaks silence after Amy Dowden 'collapses' backstage
Strictly fans 'concerned' after Chris McCausland's 'emotional' performance
He added that it "was a nice offer" but recalled how he refused the help, telling the presenters: "I'd rather go out in a blaze of glory in two weeks than do eight weeks in silence."
On Monday, he issued a warning to show bosses, telling presenter Fleur East that his last dance was "horrible".
He added: "I don't like going on first and if they put me on first again, we're going to be having words. My routine went out the window."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here