It has been reported that hospitality bosses have told Rachel Reeves her changes to National Insurance are “regressive in their impact on lower earners.”
Signatories to the letter organised by UK Hospitality, and seen by The Sunday Times, have said that “some jobs on minimum wage will become unviable” due to the new threshold announced in last week’s Budget.
The main tax rise in Ms Reeves’ fiscal statement was a change to employers’ national insurance contributions (NICs) which is expected to raise more than £25 billion for the Treasury.
Today, we pay tribute to those who made the ultimate sacrifice to defend our values and freedoms.
— Rachel Reeves (@RachelReevesMP) November 10, 2024
We will remember them. pic.twitter.com/9DrplPUXAN
In addition to increasing the rate employers pay, from 13.8% to 15%, the threshold at which employers start paying the tax will be reduced from £9,100 per year to £5,000.
According to the Times, hospitality bosses are calling for a lower NICs rate of 5% for those earning between £5,000 and £9,100, or an exemption.
The letter reads: “The changes to the NICs threshold are not just unsustainable for our business, they are regressive in their impact on lower earners and will impact flexible working practices which many older workers and parents rely upon.
“Unquestionably they will lead to business closures and job losses within a year”.
There was also a warning that “some jobs on the minimum wage will become unviable”.
Among the signatories to the letter were bosses at Whitbread and Greene King, the Times said.
Recommended reading:
Chancellor visits Manchester to promote investment in northern infrastructure
Reeves faces grilling by MPs over Budget measures
UK could attempt to talk Trump out of tariff war, Reeves tells MPs
Chairman Lord Stuart Rose said the increase in employer taxes is “a big burden for business to carry”.
He said the firm will do all it can not to pass extra costs on to consumers, but it is likely to result in rising costs at the supermarket in some form.
“We are a very efficient industry, as retailers.
“We will do everything we can to mitigate this cost.
“But of course, you can’t deny it will probably be inflationary to some degree.
“We’re just working through the details of that now… We’re looking at the impact.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel