Craig Revel Horwood has revealed how he has been forced to alter his "harsh" judging style on Strictly Come Dancing due to fear of "being cancelled".
The Australian-born dancer and TV star, who is the only original judge on the Strictly panel, admitted he had softened his trademark “cutting” remarks amid heightened scrutiny of the BBC show.
Revel Horwood, speaking to Radio Times, said: "I have changed my style of judging.
"I was really harsh 20 years ago. When I look back, I think, ‘Ooh, that’s cutting’.
“It would now be classed as bullying, and then I’d be cancelled.”
Craig Revel Horwood reveals he's altered his "cutting" judging style
While Revel Horwood hasn't completely changed his judging style on Strictly, he revealed he has shifted towards a more constructive style which involves thinking “more like a teacher than a judge”.
The 59-year-old said he used to be “very direct” with celebrities, but now chooses to “wrap the truth in a nice way”.
But in case you are worried Revel Horwood is becoming "too nice", don't worry, he still doesn't care if dancers are upset by his opinions.
Speaking to Radio Times, he said: "I’m not there for their emotions. I don’t care how it affects them in that way, because they need to learn and respect my opinion."
He also revealed he doesn't care about the backlash from fans, so much so he plans on writing a book about all the social media comments and death threats he has received over the years.
Revel Horwood said: "It will be hilarious. Over the years I’ve been keeping all these comments and so-called death threats from people who have five followers and no dance knowledge, and I’m going to shame them.
"I read these comments and think, 'Wonderful, that’s a brilliant one for the book.'"
"Things have to change" on Strictly says Craig Revel Horwood
This all comes as previous celebrities from the popular BBC One dancing show have begun speaking out about their treatment on Strictly Come Dancing, which is currently celebrating its 20th anniversary.
All the Strictly Come Dancing winners
Sherlock actress Amanda Abbington made complaints about her 2023 professional dance partner, Giovanni Pernice – who has always denied the allegations.
The BBC apologised to Abbington after they assessed the complaints and upheld some, but not all, of those made.
Among Strictly’s new duty of care measures, chaperones were placed in rehearsal rooms.
Revel Horwood added: “Things have to change.
“These dancers are world champions – they’ve been taught properly to win, and the only way you’re going to achieve that is by someone driving you. That’s embedded in their DNA, you can’t just change that overnight.
RECOMMENDED READING:
- Who left Strictly Come Dancing? Ninth celebrity eliminated in week 10 results show
- Strictly star Chris McCausland says there are 'low expectations' of disabled people
- Strictly Come Dancing confirms final celebrity for Christmas special
“That’s very different to a celebrity who’s a novice coming in. Celebrities are sensitive because they’re in the public domain. They’ve got reputations to protect and don’t want to be seen looking stupid.
“So it’s about having someone there in the room and guarding both the celebrity and the professional, and also encouraging the fact that it should be fun.
“They still need to be pushed, because we can’t get away from the fact that dancing is hard, but it’s a light entertainment programme as well.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here