A competition watchdog has found that while supermarket loyalty prices do offer “genuine savings” they are not always the cheapest option.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said that after analysing 50,000 loyalty-priced products, it found 92% offered savings on the usual price.
And customers can make savings of up to 25% by buying loyalty priced products, according to the regulator.
But it stressed that while they offer “legitimate” discounts, supermarket customers could still find cheaper alternative options by shopping around.
The CMA analysed the loyalty pricing of Tesco, Sainsbury’s, Morrisons, Waitrose and Co-op.
George Lusty, interim executive director of consumer protection, said: “We know many people don’t trust loyalty card prices, which is why we did a deep dive to get to the bottom of whether supermarkets were treating shoppers fairly.
“After analysing tens of thousands of products, we found that almost all the loyalty prices reviewed offered genuine savings against the usual price – a fact we hope reassures shoppers throughout the UK.
“While these discounts are legitimate, our review has shown that loyalty prices aren’t always the cheapest option, so shopping around is still key.”
The CMA was looking into whether non-member, or regular, prices may have been artificially inflated by supermarkets to make their loyalty price appear more attractive.
It found that shoppers can make an average saving of 17% to 25% by buying loyalty priced products across the five chains in the review.
Recommended Reading:
- Morrisons apologises to shoppers as microbiological growth risk sparks recall
- Supermarket shoppers warned of 'inevitable' price rises
- Tesco shoppers told 'do not eat' as Salmonella recall issued
As part of the wide-ranging review, the CMA also looked at the way supermarkets collect and use people’s data when they sign up to loyalty schemes.
It said it did not find any evidence of consumer law being broken in relation to this.
Sue Davies, head of food policy at consumer group Which?, said while the findings were “reassuring”, it still had concerns over the practice of loyalty pricing.
She said: “Which? has also looked at prices for thousands of products and repeatedly found examples of loyalty price offers that aren’t as good as they seem.
“We have also raised concerns that millions of consumers are being excluded from accessing lower prices due to loyalty scheme restrictions.
“It’s therefore essential that supermarkets act on the CMA’s recommendation and do more to enable people to join their schemes.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here