JIM Sillars has called for SNP MPs to back the Prime Minister’s Brexit deal on condition referendum powers are transferred to Holyrood along with a raft of economic levers.
The former SNP deputy leader – who backed leaving the EU – said as the third biggest party at Westminster, the SNP could used its influence.
READ MORE: The problem with a snap indyref2 (and a solution for an SNP weakness)
Asked if he thought his party could do more to exert leverage on the minority Tory government, he said: “What about looking for the need for more powers for Holyrood. On tax, for example. On income tax, we only have power over pay as you earn.
"We don’t have any power over dividend payments and capital gains tax nor do we have power National Insurance contributions. So yes – ask for a package of new powers – including the right to decide when to have a referendum. But also further economic powers – that would be a good trade off and I would back that.”
He said the demand for referendum powers to be given to Holyrood went further than the request for a Section 30 order, which would narrow the Scottish Government options on the timetable for a second independence vote.
“It’s different from a Section 30. If you have a Section 30, you are committed to an early referendum ... but if we had the powers over referendums we could decide on the issue of timing whenever we decide,” he added.
Asked if this was still possible, he said: “I don’t think so The SNP doesn’t think like that. They took a line from day one and have never veered from it, to condemn the [EU referendum] result. I don’t think they have made anything out of it.”
He added: “If they had taken a more positive position toward the vote they would have been able to get more. From day one after the referendum, the SNP threw away any influence they could have had.”
But SNP MP Tommy Sheppard disagreed, saying the party had made compromise suggestions to May, including pressing her for a special deal for Scotland. According to the Scottish Government plan in December 2016, Scotland would remain in the single market and have further devolution – including immigration powers.
READ MORE: First Minister writes to May over reports Scotland snubbed for DUP
Sheppard said: “Jim is coming from his position that he thinks Brexit is a good thing when pretty much everyone else in the SNP thinks Brexit is a bad thing, whether we are in the UK or not in the UK. The second thing is, we have tried to exercise leverage, we have tried to offer compromises.
“But we have been met by a government that is completely intransigent and is occupied only with shoring up a fleeting Tory party unity and is not interested in building a genuine political consensus. Over the past couple of years every time the Scottish Government or SNP has suggested compromise, it has been thrown back in our faces.
"Thirdly, specifically we have argued that f we couldn’t get what we wanted for the UK, then we wanted a differentiated settlement for Scotland. We put that forward but were treated with contempt.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel