Jacob Rees-Mogg has blasted the National Trust for not realising “how wonderful” Winston Churchill was.
The Commons Leader described the conservation charity as a “once great organisation” and claimed many of its members are “resigning in protest”.
His remarks came after the National Trust revealed how 93 of the properties it looks after have links to historic slavery and colonialism.
Properties with connections to people involved in colonial expansion, including leading figures in the East India Company, or senior figures in administering colonies, including Winston Churchill’s home Chartwell, are included in the survey.
Conservative MP Tom Hunt (Ipswich) said the inclusion of Chartwell has caused “great anger” for some of his constituents.
He told the Commons: “They see Winston Churchill as arguably the greatest Briton there ever was.
“Will (Mr Rees-Mogg) find time to debate Churchill’s legacy and the man that he was and how we should be proud of him, and how we should push back upon the left’s attempts in their determination to try and denigrate his past?
“And also would (Mr Rees-Mogg) take into account the concerns that many of us have about our once-loved and currently loved national organisations being increasingly influenced and taken over by wokeist elements?”
Mr Rees-Mogg replied: “(Mr Hunt) is absolutely spot on.
“We should be so proud of our great heroes in this nation like Winston Churchill.
“And an organisation like the National Trust should be honoured that it has Chartwell amongst its portfolio of properties.
“And it should remember that its properties were given to it by people who expected them to be custodians of our history, to be proud of our history, and to think well of our great nation, not to be shamefacedly quietly hiding away, pretending that they are abashed about the greatness that this country has enjoyed over so many centuries.
“It is sad that a once great organisation, a membership organisation that owes a duty to its members – many of whom I hear are now resigning in protest – cannot realise how wonderful a man like Churchill was and he is not alone.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel