The BBC must look at how Martin Bashir acquired his other “scoops” following the damning report into how he landed his interview with Diana, Princess of Wales, Channel 4’s former head of news has said.
Dorothy Byrne said the revelations in Lord Dyson’s report that Bashir used “deceitful behaviour” to secure his exclusive 1995 Panorama interview were “scandalous”.
She told Sky News’ Trevor Phillips On Sunday programme that the BBC and ITV should now look at other stories Bashir provided them with.
Ms Byrne said: “Other people who have been interviewed by Martin Bashir have complained that he lied to them and we know that the BBC wrote a formal letter to ITV about his conduct on several stories.
“So I think that both BBC and ITV need to look at all his scoops.”
Bashir left the BBC in 1999, four years after his interview with Diana, to join ITV.
In 2016, he was rehired as the BBC’s religious affairs correspondent, before becoming religion editor – a role from which he resigned this month citing ill health.
Royal biographer Andrew Morton said Diana’s interview with Bashir was not a case of self-indulgence, but instead “self-preservation” as she had been put into a state of fear and trepidation.
Asked if Bashir could have landed the interview had he not lied, Morton said: “He wouldn’t have got it, he scared her half to death.
He told Sky’s Trevor Phillips On Sunday programme: “He had her thinking he had contacts inside MI5, he was very plausible, he arranged meetings in underground car parks – scary places at the best of times, but when you think your life was in danger it was very potent.
“She was put in a state of fear and trepidation.”
However, Morton said Diana would have given the interview to another journalist eventually.
“There was no question at all Diana was going to speak her mind,” Morton added.
He said: “An awful lot of what she did say (during the interview) had been circulating before that, but because it came out of her mouth it seemed sensational, raw and new.”
In an interview with The Sunday Times, Bashir said he “never wanted to harm” Diana.
He told the paper: “Everything we did in terms of the interview was as she wanted, from when she wanted to alert the palace, to when it was broadcast, to its contents … My family and I loved her.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel