CIVIL servants with “nationalist sympathies” are undermining the work of Tory ministers in the Scotland Office, a Labour lord has claimed.
George Foulkes said a “Conservative source” had told him the work of Alister Jack, Malcolm Offord, and John Lamont – the three Scotland Office ministers – was being undermined.
The Labour politician said that the head of the Civil Service – Simon Case – “should step in”.
The Scotland Office declined to comment on his allegations.
Foulkes had written on Twitter: “A Conservative source tells me that Scotland Office ministers are being undermined by civil servants with nationalist sympathies. The head of the Civil Service should step in.”
A Conservative source tells me that Scotland Office Ministers are being undermined by civil servants with Nationalist sympathies. The head of the Civil Service should step in.
— George Foulkes (@GeorgeFoulkes) July 12, 2023
The targeting of unnamed civil servants echoes attacks launched by Tory politicians and ministers on the "blob", a byword for the service.
Case said on Wednesday that such language was "insulting, dehumanising, [and] totally unacceptable".
Foulkes's claims come after confusion surrounded whether or not staff in the Scotland Office, working under Advocate General Keith Stewart KC, would be probing the Scottish Government’s spending in reserved areas.
Last week, Foulkes made public an email from Stewart, the UK’s top law officer for Scotland, which seemed to explicitly say there was a probe ongoing.
But sources in the Scotland Office, which handles Stewart’s communications, categorically denied to multiple news outlets that any such investigation exists.
Foulkes told The National that he did not know who was issuing the denials from the Scotland Office, but added: “I understand they are not doing it with the authority of ministers.”
READ MORE: Chaos and confusion over potential UK probe into Scottish independence spending
Asked if there was any news on the possible probe, the Scotland Office said its position was unchanged.
Last week, their official line was: “It is up to the Scottish Government how it spends its record block grant in devolved areas.
“We have been consistently clear that we think that the priority for people in Scotland is halving inflation, tackling the NHS waiting times, ensuring energy security, and growing our economy across the whole of UK.”
However, any investigation would specifically be into money spent in reserved areas such as the constitution, not devolved areas.
Foulkes, and other Unionist politicians, have taken particular exception to Jamie Hepburn’s appointment as a Minister for Independence in the Scottish Government led by Humza Yousaf.
Cryptically, the Labour peer wrote on social media minutes before his claim about nationalist civil servants: "The spending on a so-called Minister for Independence and entourage is illegal and must be stopped.
"If the UK Government does not act I have a further opportunity to pursue this soon."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel