IT’S often said you don’t appreciate what’s on your own doorstep and despite my years in Pakistan and Bangladesh, I never did get to visit Afghanistan. But my three years’ education there did enable me to make friends with Afghani and Pathan girls.
I sat on Sunday pulled between live coverage from Kabul and David Pratt’s excellent article – The Taliban’s Return – whilst remembering those friends, the stories of their lands, tribes, even the two whole sentences I was taught in Pushto.
I remember them “explaining” their history, not as I had learnt from the view of Empire, and their boast that Afghanistan was never conquered, never “captured”. I don’t remember us ever discussing the Persians being there in the BC years, but we were mere teenagers. There was a pragmatic shrug from one, who told me she’d heard it said “we’d wait to see who’s winning and then join them”. Sometimes the joining was negotiated, sometimes it was immediate expediency.
READ MORE: Dominic Raab says UK Government 'didn't see Taliban takeover of Afghanistan coming'
At the time, I didn’t understand. But I began to, during the Russian invasion from 1979 to 1989, attempting to follow the rival warlords and their inter-tribal horse-trading, along with the mental gymnastics of some as they justified negotiations with the Russians.
Was it of immediate concern to the fighters who supplied their arms, ammunition? I doubt it, since payback would always be “later”, after the fighting was over. And who was that overseas fighter who had pitched up, Osama Bin Laden? Who was funding him in the fight against the Russians? But that fight slipped into the civil war of the 1990s and the emergence of the Taliban. They were then, and they are now, an unelected totalitarian theocracy. And so the West bombed Afghanistan post-9/11, shipped out men and boys to Guantanamo, whilst seeming to promise a self-sustaining, social democratic state with equality for everyone, especially the young, the girls the women.
Within 20 years? With rampant corruption? And still without cross-country infrastructure we take for granted: transportation, roads, hospitals, education, training facilities for the required professionals to maintain and progress their nation. Instead, it comes with porous borders surrounded by states that still view it as a gateway to other countries, with their resources, markets, and ultimately the Indian Ocean. Neighbouring countries view it as a buffer zone between old foes.
READ MORE: Ian Blackford calls on UK Government to take in 35,000 Afghan refugees
If you witnessed others profiteering and profiting but you’re not paid regularly, your ammunition depleted, not resupplied, your families in unsecured rural areas, the first to fall, would you stand and fight?
With what? And for whom? So maybe that’s where the pragmatic approach comes into play, the immediate expediency required to survive.
How will the recall of parliament here help them there? Just to see more hand-ringing, head-nodding, castigating the “cowardice” of a supposedly well-trained military. I doubt the missing-in-action Foreign Secretary will do more than make the usual wordy speech, unable to disguise another failure of the UK Government this time, possibly the worst foreign policy debacle since the ill-advised, ill-conceived Suez catastrophe.
Will Scotland offer some succour, some homes, some future to a few of the thousands who will inevitably flee? Or will the likes of the PM and Patel in Westminster continue to control decisions and policies that view refugees, asylum seekers, newcomers as a number first, requiring state support, without recognising our generations and what we’ve brought and contributed?
As ever, I believe Scotland will do what little it can whilst confined within the failed state that is the UK.
Selma Rahman
Edinburgh
WHAT next, First Minister, what next?
The conjurers and alchemists of Westminster are now hard at work spinning their web of deceit. It turns out that these same are no friends of an independent, progressive, modern, internationalist and European Scottish state.
In 2014, the Scottish Government made a case for independence in a substantial document of several hundred pages. In 2016, the fanatics and zealots of English nationalist imperialism made their case with an egregious lie inscribed on the side of a bus. It is this same bus that will be used as Trojan horse to smash its way through any notion of independence.
In 2016 we were instructed that we entered the European Union referendum as “one United Kingdom”. In the stark light of day, in the tragic aftermath, the will of the voters of Scotland and of Northern Ireland counted for nothing.
READ MORE: Time now to focus on independence ... and start setting the heather alight
The “Union of equals” revealed itself for what it always was, and those of the public media who typically ascribe the break-up of the United Kingdom to the machinations of the SNP are thus required to re-configure their proscriptions.
The spores of the present public health crisis germinated in the scorched earth of Westminster’s politically motivated austerity, catastrophic disinvestment, and the hollowing out of the public sector. Public assets, previously held in common ownership, are now commodities traded between private equity monoliths.
These once public assets now engirdle the earth in an instant, while the youth of our nation are no longer free to work and access higher education in the European Union. This is the true investment of the “taking back of control”.
Until Scotland becomes independent, this stigmata of the zealots and fanatics of English nationalist imperialism will remain a permanent brand imprinted upon the youth of Scotland.
The spores of the next pandemic already germinate in the corrupted soil of a Westminster administration of incendiary incompetence and lassitude.
What they sow, we reap.
I am not sure, therefore, that awaiting the pleasure of an insurgent virus or a viral Westminster autocracy is a superior tactic for the Scottish leadership to embrace.
Where to now, First Minister? Where to, now?
Keith Steiner
Cornhill, Aberdeenshire
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here