THERE was a television show back in the 1970s called Connections, presented by science historian James Burke, which was both educational and interesting. More recently, the BBC aired a similar programme, How It Works. It would be fascinating if such a show was presented to demonstrate the interconnections and political biases of the individuals and organisations within this publicly professed “United Kingdom”. This is a state where virtually everything is beholden of the Westminster Parliament, its committees and quangos, or directly from the crown itself, by charter, appointment or other, including Parliament.
Britain is, effectively, a nation state made up of four countries, where the central controlling government, dedicated to holding the conglomerate together, literally controls everything of any importance, and where power devolved, as soon as it is perceived as a threat, is subverted.
It does this most effectively by brainwashing or indoctrinating key individuals within the component nations into supporting it. It begins, through personal recollection, with the state-run education system, using it to do anything from berate and beat children (1872 Education Act) into using only the King’s/Queen’s English rather than embracing all the positives of being at least bi-lingual, to providing a very light glossary of independent national competencies or heroes, unless these supported or enhanced the state/empire. Such supporting individuals are historically rewarded with peerages or other forms of elevation. To date, no high-profile promoter of independence has been so publicly rewarded, while many have seen careers diverted or destroyed, the most recent of which is SNP councillor Chris McEleny, “suspected” of “espionage” – this for the SNP?
Examine the reserved competencies, amongst which is broadcasting, with the central state having control of who gets which licences. The unspoken threat is well understood: severely upset the state, then either don’t get authorisation to broadcast, or perhaps see it revoked/not renewed.
The BBC is possibly today’s ultimate expression of this, being funded by tax money. The words “licence” and “tax” are interchangeable. It is, in much of what it produces, a propaganda machine for the state. It has been so since its inception, when one phrase bandied around was that it would be “the glue to hold the state together”, although they often used “nation” or “empire” back then. This was at the time of Irish independence, when Scots’ self-rule was effectively binned.
There has been a distinct lack of credible evidence to show that this bias has ever changed. If any needed additional proof of that, simply examine Boris Johnson’s recent comments, that “England already has a Parliament, it’s in Westminster!”. The unspoken extrapolation in the mind of the Tory front runner, as with so very many of London’s supporting cast; England has a parliament, that their house is superior to all others, and they will do whatever is required to ensure that it shall remain so.
Those connections extend to Boris Johnson, from schooling through today, where he apparently remains handily protected from his own ludicrous buffoonery and incompetence by his links to privilege extending back through Oxford University’s Bullingdon Club. The state will protect those who will protect the British state. Why else would the BBC selectively edit out aspects of Boris’s life which might damage him? One is funded by the state, the other, like so many, is intrinsic to it.
It is past time for Scotland to fully disconnect from the British state, a London-run outfit which has consistently practised cultural genocide against Scots for centuries.
Ashley MacGregor
East Kilbride
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel