WITH reference to Jim Johnson’s letter (October 22), several National readers have, like Lesley Riddoch, John Drummond and others, commented on the need for a written constitution. So, let’s get on with it rather than just talk about it!
In April this year a registered charity titled Constitution for Scotland was set up. The sole purpose of this charity is to fund a professional, interactive, intuitive website that will provide a secure, internet-based platform to debate, propose, amend and vote on the content of a constitution for a self-governing Scotland.
READ MORE: An unpleasant future awaits if we don’t get independence soon
Following the public debate and voting period, the end product will be presented at a national convention, and when approved will be submitted to the Scottish executive for consideration as a legislative proposal.
Recent events have clearly demonstrated that political parties cannot be relied upon to put the overall requirements of the public before party obligations. There is therefore a critical need for a written constitution to be debated and agreed by the electorate prior to independence. This will provide a sense of common ownership and an understanding of what we want in a constitution for a future democratic Scotland.
The background to the charity was a group of professional Scots who over a period of some four years debated and agreed a model constitution created to guide a public debate for ALL interested folks.
The final draft may be wholly different from the model, but that will be by the agreement of the participants.
The charity website sets out the specification for a professional, interactive, intuitive website and because of the technical complexity of the required website to ensure security the costs have risen above the original funding, hence the need for donations. Please read about the project and contribute at www.constitutionforscotland.scot.
Bob Ingram
Chair, Constitution for Scotland
IT all began two years ago, when the Catalan people came out to vote in a referendum of self-determination. The Spanish Government called it illegal and used brute force to stop the vote. Thousands of people were savagely beaten by the police. Catalan politicians and social leaders were jailed for allowing people to vote.
Pro-independence people of all ambits have been persecuted, imprisoned and accused of terrorism, without any evidence to prove it.
The Catalan movement is known all over the world for its civic and peaceful attitude, and has been actively demonstrating this principle in the streets for years.
We waited for the sentence of the Spanish justice system. We knew that it would be as harsh as the repression we are receiving. The sentence for the members of the Catalan Government, added up for those on trial, was 100 years in prison. Many of us have taken to the streets to say “enough!
Barcelona airport was paralysed on the day of the sentence, October 14. We took part in the different protests all over the territory. More than half a million people took part in freedom marches, some walking up to 100km in three days to reach the heart of Barcelona. What is the response of the Spanish state? An uncontrolled and disproportionate repression.
They beat the protesters, they shoot rubber balls – which are illegal under Catalan law – they arrested the demonstrators and call them violent and terrorists. In the streets you can see demonstrators protesting with forcefulness (they set fire to containers and organize barricades), prompting Spain to threaten us with a possible declaration of a state of exception. However, in previous days, Spain had approved similar attitudes of the demonstrators in Hong Kong, considering they were fighting for their rights.
But it seems that as Catalans, we do not deserve to protest for our rights. Did they think we were going to accept their repressive tactics and their unjust sentencing? We will continue the rebellion until we achieve our freedom and our independence.
Lola Salmerón
Barcelona
I HATE to add to Ian Murray’s woes, but did he not declare in 2015 that he was the MP for the “Socialist Republic of Edinburgh South”, which takes in the douce suburbs of Newington and Morningside? Just thought I would remind him the Labour party are no longer relevant to the poor and working poor anywhere in Scotland, and he has to depend on middlle-class votes to get re-elected.
Joe Wallace
via email
AS morning of the 25th dawns, can I offer our editor Callum and his hardworking team at The National our congratulations for a job well done, with issue 1500.
Without your dedication and continued hard work our success would not have reached the level you have achieved. Keep up the good work; the independence movement needs you!
George M Mitchell
Dunblane
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel