I WISH to respond to comments expressed by Kenny MacAskill in yesterday’s National (Indyref2020 still on despite MP’s claim it’s unlikely, January 3).
As a new MP I believe he has a collective responsibility to the party and his fellow MPs to ensure that his opinions and criticisms of SNP policy and in fact anything which, in general, creates mixed messages about SNP policy are kept in check and remain part of party discussion.
It has not taken him long to seek controversy!
During his time in the “wilderness” he readily criticised many of the SNP government’s policies and actions. Like Jim Sillars, he clearly has and had the right to do so like any observer or member of the public. Clearly many such responses were not only welcomed but were a godsend for our opponents to feed on and declare “great divisions” within the SNP.
READ MORE: SNP say indyref2020 is still on – despite MP’s claim it’s unlikely
I am not suggesting for one moment that politicians do not have the right to hold and express differing points of view, however, upon becoming an MP or holding political office they should have due regard for the consequences and fallout of anything said or actions taken, not only at constituency level but at agreed policy level.
In relation to his suggestion that “the likelihood of a referendum in the short term is slim ... more likely nil”, this may be the case, but only time will tell. We do not need, at the beginning of the year, speculation by new MPs like Ken MacAskill which torpedoes the policy in place, of going for late 2020 to hold a referendum.
Much depends on what the intervening Brexit shambles will do to the UK, and Scotland in particular.
The EU negotiations are already stalling, after the Johnson declaration of Brexit completion “in law” by the end of 2020 was met with surprise and bewilderment by the EU president.
READ MORE: SNP MP MacAskill suggests more cautious approach to indyref
As we go through 2020 it will become obvious to all that Scotland will be at the centre of a mitigated disaster economically, socially and politically as this right-wing Tory government flexes its Brexit muscles.
It has to be said briefly that what is important at this time is for supporters of independence – be they SNP supporters, activists, politicians or members of the wider Yes movement – to take stock of where we are regarding the level of support for independence and a second independence referendum.
The recent General Election has clearly indicated that although we remain shy of a majority, we clearly are close to achieving our goal if we get the strategy right!
Can I suggest that Mr MacAskill and others who carp from the sides, pointing out the problems and flaws of independence policies and targets, divert their energies into convincing those yet uncertain about voting Yes, to join us on our crusade towards independence.
Dan Wood
Kirriemuir
I FEEL after reading both the article about Kenny MacAskill’s remarks and and the comments beneath it that someone’s winding MacAskill up to believe he’s better than he is. This is very much an old Unionist trick of divide and conquer which too many, at the moment, are swallowing.
Time, I feel, to let the dust settle down a bit, keep our powder dry and let the yoons sweat out that which they greatly fear – Scotland’s departing them. Hoping as many as possible can get into Glasgow on the 11th and get them worried even more.
Happy New Year to all independence supporters and all the best to us this year. Saor Alba.
Barrie S Gammie
via thenational.scot
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel