ON the Andrew Marr show on Sunday Dominic Raab, on two significant fronts, underlined just why Scotland is moving in favour of independence.
Firstly, he made it clear he believes that everyone operates on the basis of personal greed rather than the understanding that, to have better public services and a more equitable society, you might just have to pay more in tax. Dominic Raab saw this as an issue worth pursuing in an attempt to portray the SNP in a negative light, ironically even though Scottish people voted for higher taxes (for some).
Of course his adherence to policies promoting personal greed is perhaps unsurprising given some of his party are allegedly going to benefit on a personal level from associations with American companies when/if the much vaunted trade deal is signed with the US.
READ MORE: Tories branded 'clueless' as Dominic Raab rejects Scottish visa
Thankfully, however, the politics of greed of the Tory party are being rejected for the politics of hope being practised in Scotland.
Dominic Raab also made a big deal of the Australian points system for immigration, without in fact giving much detail, and then implied in a scathing manner that a different immigration system for Scotland could not work. This is deliberately misleading, through completely unsubstantiated assertion; this appears commonplace in Tory politics these days, and presumably we can expect much more of this in the months and years ahead as the establishment continue to seek to sow fear and concern about Scottish independence.
The politics of greed combine with the Tory government’s wish not to be the ones that history will record as having “lost Scotland” for reasons of self-interest. It is hard, indeed well nigh impossible, to ascertain any real concern for Scotland.
WATCH: Boris Johnson exposes hypocrisy over Scottish visa plan
Returning to the issue of immigration, and having personally gone through the Australian points system, I can reassure Mr Raab that a separate Scottish immigration system doesn’t seem at all difficult to me. Independence would be the preferred solution but even before that, if a person applies to migrate to Scotland and is successful, whether they are fruit picker or brain surgeon, they get a stamp in their existing passport which says “Eligible to work and live in Scotland” or something of that ilk. Employers, who make the appropriate checks on people at the moment, estate agencies and benefits offices etc would simply check the passport of any migrant to the UK.
Let’s face it, the UK Government in introducing an Australian points system to the UK will have to do something like that anyway. Otherwise how do they distinguish between a migrant from Chile or the Philippines and a person who has just come on a visit ? Or are they going to stop all visitors? It sometimes feels like it. Where, exactly, is “the major problem” alluded to by Mr Raab?
It is indeed sad, and to Scotland’s detriment, that there is so much control exercised through the single-solution politics proposed and then put into practice by a UK Government that seems intent in pursuing policies which not only appeal to personal greed, but which are also manifestly not in the interests of Scotland (or indeed other areas remote from London). Sadly, they are in the interests of the governing Tory elite...
Bring on independence and the politics of hope!
Rab Mungall
via email
IT is Sunday morning, we’ve been out of the EU for just 36 hours, and Andrew Marr hosts his usual weekly offering. He has a government minister on to tell us all how it is. The preening self-confidence of the man fair drips off him, as he stops barely short of an actual sneer.
Every dismissive claim, insinuation and opinion is that he is correct, the Union is correct and there is no possibility of his, and his party’s politics-of-greed agenda being wrong. With 44% support across the UK he is better placed to decide Scotland’s future than the whole population of Scotland, never mind the SNP who just smashed his party in last month’s General Election.
Everything that is wrong with the UK is right there, you only have to look. Raab, pompous, bombastic and with brash confidence, plants England’s needs as Scotland’s wishes. He couldn’t be more wrong.
There is an African ideal of Ubuntu. How can I be happy if my friend is sad? An idea very similar to the sharing atween Jock Tamson’s bairns. You see we Scots care. Care aboot more than the silver in oor pooches. We take social responsibility seriously. And paying tax is the largest of those.
Aye Raab, keep yer tax avoidance, yer offshore funds and yer stolen riches. We want none of it. Scots can manage Scotland far better than a Westminster government that has squandered our oil wealth and is still £2 trillion in debt. We’ve nae need o’ yer charity offsetting yer tax liability.
In independent Scotland we will pay our tax and be looked after, baby box to grave.
Brian Kelly
Dunfermline
REGARDING Westminster’s proposed love bombing advert campaign – is political advertising on TV not banned? Another potential court challenge?
As for cinema advertising, I hope any such ads will be treated with the same disdain as the obligatory playing of God save the Queen at the end of the night once was!
Andrew McCracken
Grantown-on-Spey
EDITOR’S APPEAL
DID you send The National a letter headed “Democracy Rebellion”, setting out three demands of the UK Government? Please drop us an email, in confidence, to letters@thenational.scot or contact one of our reporters: Kathleen Nutt on 0141 302 6605 (kathleen.nutt@thenational.scot) or Andrew Learmonth on 0141 302 6124 (andrew.learmonth@thenational.scot).
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel