THOUSANDS of vulnerable people are continuing to be targeted by landlords offering accommodation in return for sex, the First Minister heard yesterday.
Pauline McNeill, a Labour MSP for Glasgow, told Nicola Sturgeon that according to a campaign group 2000 women a year – including students and people struggling for money – had been targeted by online advertisers.
She urged the First Minister to consider if the law could be strengthened to crackdown on advertising sex for rent.
READ MORE: Living Rent calls on Government to end 'parasitic approach to housing'
“Last year, it was reported in the press that adverts explicitly seeking sex for rent were appearing online,” she told Holyrood during First Minister’s Questions yesterday.
“As a result of those reports, websites such as Craigslist enhanced the filters that they apply to stop the practice. However, landlords are still seeking sex for rent through online ads by using euphemistic terms such as “rent for fun”.
“Living Rent has claimed that 2000 women are offered rent in exchange for sex every year. I have seen for myself that those adverts deliberately target vulnerable people by claiming—this is the key point—that the arrangement is perfectly suited to students or people who are struggling for money.”
READ MORE: Scots protesters shut down Edinburgh buy to let workshop
She added: “Does the First Minister agree that the practice is immoral and that it should be against the law to prey on vulnerable men and women who are struggling for money?
“If a gap in the law exists, I urge the First Minister to speak to the Lord Advocate to legislate against advertising sex for rent.”
READ MORE: Living Rent charter bids to halt Universal Credit evictions
The First Minister said “forcing someone ... to participate in sexual activity is a crime already” but added the issue of whether further legislation was needed would be a matter for Holyrood.
She said that Scottish government minister Kevin Stewart had previously written to online platforms, to draw their attention to the unacceptability of the practice.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel