I READ with both interest and not an inconsiderable rancour the article by Kevin McKenna (The fight against neo-liberalism starts as soon as we leave the UK, December 16).
I really did not understand his thinking and what audience he was aiming at. Let me try!
Was this an attack on the SNP? Was it a call to the Socialist faithful? Was it a recruitment drive for the Labour party, but not Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour party? Was he recruiting for the SSP? He certainly rather vividly made clear where he was “coming from”, no ifs no buts.
Perhaps Kevin McKenna shows his true politics like never before. To suggest the SNP is a party run by big business and has a neoliberal philosophy at its roots is just not true. It is a left-of-centre social democratic party and its policies are there for all to see. For 13 years the bulk of Scottish voters have supported these policies while out-and-out socialist policies have withered on the vine in Scotland, as has the Labour party both in Scotland and the UK. Far-left socialism has been all but forgotten.
READ MORE: Kevin McKenna: SNP neo-liberalism must be fought, but we cannot while in the UK
He waxes lyrically about Jeremy Corbyn, suggesting his failure to introduce radical socialism was the result of dark political forces undermining his vision. The rise and fall of Corbynism – which, let’s face it, was spectacular – was more to do with the public. Many Labour supporters, after close scrutiny of not only the man himself but his vision of a socialist UK, found him wanting and delivered their verdict through the ballot box. The “red wall in the North” collapsed. How does Kevin Mckenna explain this?
There is no question that as he describes his personal journey to Yes this journey has also been mine and that of many others who lived through those difficult times and continue to do so. I do not, however, understand why he needs a “stiff drink “ every time he votes for the independence-supporting SNP. This is very condescending and perhaps a little tongue-in-cheek. Either way I am sure the SNP are happy to get the vote. I am sure he is not the only person who bites their lip before putting an X in the box for the SNP. Lets face it, if we are going to win independence we are going to have to attract many reluctant Labour voters who are clearly looking to a post-independence Labour party to emerge on the spectrum of Scottish politics.
What saddened me the most was his rather vicious unfounded attack on the SNP and the suggestion that the SNP were “in the pay” of big business and that SNP policies failed to be radical enough as a consequence. The facts clearly show otherwise. He reverts once again in to the world of fantasy with his vision of an independent socialist republic. Independent and republic I accept; socialist is just a pipe dream.
Finally, I am not a sleep walking SNP loyalist but a hardworking activist foot soldier. Kevin, please stop the divisive sniping and name-calling and keep your political powder dry until after we are independent.
Dan Wood
Kirriemuir
TODAY'S piece by Kevin McKenna was another tour de force. I find myself agreeing with Kevin on all of what was said in his article, particularly when he pointed out how “the party has permitted a large number of fakes and opportunists to hitch their careers and finances to the only political show in town”.
Absolutely correct – these carpet-baggers have hitched their star to the SNP juggernaut, not in the hope of regaining our country’s independence or to make the lives of Scotland’s people better, but quite simply to feather their own nests.
The party was, and in some respects still is, at a crossroads, but the first steps have been taken to make the party accountable to the members.
It’s been a while coming!
Cameron M Fraser
Bannockburn
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel