YOU would think Boris Johnson might have done his homework ahead of this, the first PMQs of the new term. After all, Keir Starmer was bound to ask him about the food “hampers” that are supposed to add up to a week’s worth of lunches.
Shameful images of cling-filmed cheese slices and meagre halved vegetables show the grim reality facing children and parents in England who would usually be entitled to free meals at school, but are currently at home due to lockdown.
Starmer wants to know if Johnson would be happy for his own children to live on these rations, and it sounds like he wouldn’t given he calls them “disgraceful images”. But he can’t resist the opportunity to tell the politician opposite that footballer Marcus Rashford is doing a better job than he is when it comes to holding the Government to account.
Undeterred, Starmer shoots and scores by pointing out that the photographed parcels fall only slightly short of the examples set out in Department of Education guidance – the difference being little more than “a tin of sweetcorn, a packet of ham, and a bottle of milk”. So given this is a scandal of the Government's own making, will the guidance be taken down by the end of the day?
READ MORE: Boris Johnson responds to Ian Blackford's Brexit question with indyref2 rant
Presumably not, since Johnson swerves the question and calls Starmer a hypocrite on the basis that it was a Conservative government, not a Labour one, that introduced free school meals. I believe technically the policy was Nick Clegg’s idea, but let’s not allow details to get in the way of irrelevant point-scoring attempts.
The Speaker isn’t happy with the PM’s tone, asserting with touching credulity: “I don’t believe anybody’s a hypocrite in this chamber." With all the over-optimistic zeal of someone writing out their new year's resolutions on page one of a fancy new diary, he adds: “We’re tidying up how this parliament behaves!”
READ MORE: Boris Johnson rebuked by Ian Blackford for getting SNP's name wrong
Excellent, so surely now the PM will start answering the questions and treating others with respect. There will be no more silly name-calling, false claims or ludicrous attempts to distract from the topic of the questions.
That hope is dashed within one minute and 54 seconds, at which point the Speaker has to jump in again to tell him that there are questions and that sometimes (only sometimes?!) he has to try to answer them. Minutes later it’s left to a fizzing Ian Blackford to condemn Johnson’s persistent attempts to “traduce the name of the Scottish National Party”.
He is doing his best to highlight the plight of Scottish seafood exporters who are losing at least £1 million in sales per day due to Brexit red tape.
The response? A rant about the SNP’s ambitions for Scotland and an utterly bizarre challenge to the SNP’s Westminster leader to “say that he likes the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine".
The Speaker has apparently used up all his interventions for the day, as he responds with nothing more than a chuckle while introducing the next question. Because who cares if Johnson is disrespectful to the SNP, ignores Blackford’s question and completely changes the subject?
READ MORE: Shameless Boris Johnson repeats debunked Tory lie about vaccines
The Speaker may not believe there are any hypocrites in the Commons but it’s clear that double standards apply. Johnson will be delighted that Blackford fought back – anything to distract from the serious issue he's trying to raise.
Perhaps someone should send the PM his own hamper. Let's see what he can rustle up from a loaf, cheese slices, half a cucumber and a bag of spoiled prawns.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel