AUSTRALIA’S deputy prime minister has admitted he isn’t concerned about the impact his government’s trade deal with the UK will have on farmers in the devolved nations.
Michael McCormack said his only concern was for his own country’s farmers as he talked up the economic benefits of the agreement – sparking demands for the Scottish Tories to rebel against their Westminster bosses.
The UK Government wants to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership with countries including Australia, Canada, Japan and New Zealand.
Farmers and animal welfare campaigners are concerned the deal with Australia will lead to cheaper imports undercutting UK meat, which is produced to higher standards. This has led to fears that Scottish farmers will be put out of business, with Boris Johnson yesterday accused by the SNP of “literally giving the farm away”.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson told he's 'talking tripe' about Australian trade deal
McCormack, however, is delighted with the deal, which is predicted to boost the Austrialian economy.
He told the Today programme: “The big winners are Australian producers, Australian farmers, indeed Australians full stop. This could be 1.3 billion [Australian] dollars boost to the economy.”
McCormack heralded the prospect of “68 million [UK] customers bidding for Australia’s wonderful chops, wonderful sheep meat, but beef as well, sugar…”
The deputy PM added: “Duty-free access to UK markets and eventually, over a period of between eight and 10 years for those agricultural commodities, there won’t be any tariffs at all.”
McCormarck was asked about the concerns of farmers in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, who have warned the free market access could dilute standards and run them out of business.
He replied: “I’m not so worried about those ones you mentioned … I always put Australians first. I’m worried and concerns about Australian producers. I want what’s best for them.”
Those comments prompted SNP politicians to demand a U-turn from the Scottish Tories, who have refused to speak out against the deal.
MSP Jim Fairlie tweeted: “I’m paraphrasing ‘Australian beef sheepmeat and sugar producers, these are big wins and big numbers for our produces’. So where are the big wins for Scotland’s producers @Douglas4Moray?”
I’m paraphrasing “Australian beef sheepmeat and sugar producers, these are big wins and big numbers for our produces”. So where are the big wins for Scotland’s producers @Douglas4Moray ? https://t.co/pG54u0C2Hn
— Jim Fairlie MSP (@JimFairlieLogie) June 17, 2021
READ MORE: SNP rubbish Alister Jack's claim Australia deal is 'huge opportunity' for Scots
MP Chris Law added: “So the Tories shafted Scottish fisherman over Brexit and now we know this Aussie deal will shaft our farmers.”
He urged Ross and Alister Jack “to stand up for our farmers”.
The SNP have previously called for the Scottish Conservative leader to speak out on the deal, which Downing Street has repeatedly refused to say would not introduce hormone-injected beef to the UK.
Writing in the Scottish Farmer in October 2020, Ross promised to be “out there on the frontline with farmers saying no, never” should such a situation ever arise.
The Scottish Secretary, however, has argued that the post-Brexit agreement is a “huge opportunity” for Scottish producers.
He said last week: “I think it will also take us into the Trans-Pacific Partnership, it’s a gateway deal into that, which is a huge, huge opportunity for Scotland’s food and drink industry.”
The Scottish Tories have been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel