MICHAEL Gove has said that he "can't see" Boris Johnson granting a new referendum on Scottish independence before the next General Election.
The senior Cabinet minister - who has now been put in charge of countering the push for independence in Scotland - said the Prime Minister was focused on recovery from the coronavirus pandemic “for the lifetime of this parliament”.
His comments appear to go further than other ministers who have said that this is the wrong time for another referendum.
Under the Fixed Term Parliaments Act, the next General Election is not due until May 2024 – although Johnson is committed to repealing the act which could allow him to go to the country before then.
READ MORE: Michael Gove plans to scrap Evel in bid to stop Scottish independence
Asked in an interview with The Daily Telegraph whether there was “any circumstance” in which Johnson would approve a referendum before a May 2024 election, Gove said: “I don’t think so.”
Asked whether his position was that “there will be no referendum before the 2024 election”, he replied: “I can’t see it.”
After pro-independence parties won a majority in the elections to the Scottish Parliament in May, First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said it was “a matter of when, not if” there would be a second referendum.
The SNP have maintained that they will not push for a second referendum until after the pandemic is over but have insisted that they would look to hold one in the current Holyrood parliamentary term, which runs until 2026.
Gove’s intervention may heighten the chances of a unilateral referendum without the approval of Westminster, which would almost certainly result in a legal battle through the courts.
READ MORE: Gerry Hassan: Without UK-wide reform the Scottish question will never go away
Gove however insisted that it was “foolish” to talk about a referendum at a time when the country was still recovering from the coronavirus pandemic.
“The Prime Minister is completely focused on making sure that, for the lifetime of this parliament, we increase economic opportunity, we provide people with the chance to make more of their lives, take control of their futures. And that’s quite rightly what the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom’s focus should be,” he said.
“It seems to me to be at best reckless, at worst folly, to try to move the conversation on to constitutional division when people expect us to be working together in order to deal with these challenges.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel