RUTH Wishart writes that the debate on trans rights should be conducted civilly and without the chucking around of instant judgements (Why is a trans minority being pandered to by the Scottish Government?, Aug 15). We completely agree.
The campaign for trans equality has been led in Scotland by the Scottish Trans Alliance, a project here at the Equality Network, and by colleagues at LGBT Youth Scotland and Stonewall Scotland. Ruth could take a look at the Facebook and Twitter channels of all those organisations. She will find them a model of civility.
She could then look at social media directed at our organisations, such as our Twitter mentions. She’ll see over the past few days a deluge of tweets, including those calling us maniacs, child abusers and paedophiles, from people who don’t like the fact that we work for trans equality. Much of the language is unrepeatable, but one tweet this morning asks: “Why are there not angry mobs with burning torches outside these people’s homes?”
READ MORE: Why is a trans minority being pandered to by the Scottish Government?
Take any significantly sized sample of people, and you will find some unacceptable behaviour – that’s the nature of humanity. Those of us who believe in civil debate need to hold fast to that and promote it assiduously. Civility can go out of the window very fast, and holding on to it is not helped by people accusing others of “hijacking” and “infiltration”.
A civil approach to these issues would surely have included Ruth contacting some of the organisations listed above to hear why these issues are important to the small minority who are trans, and why trans equality can be delivered without negatively impacting on other people’s rights.
Tim Hopkins
Director, Equality Network
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel