RUTH Wishart is arguing for common sense. People are afraid to talk, and process the complexity of the boundary tensions between different groups. These boundary tensions won’t go away unless we find a way to talk, and understand.
One protected characteristic, such as being female, should not be undermined by another, and vice versa. On the whole, the vast majority of women are born with less physical strength than men – should we ignore or respect biology? If women are feeling colonised, should we not listen to their voices, and try to understand? Or do women born as female, and having lived the life of a female since a baby, once again have to zip it?
E Vyner
via thenational.scot
I HAVE become aware of the backlash Ruth Wishart is getting after her article in the Sunday National. She states: ”It is not transphobic but perfectly reasonable to inquire why the legitimate need for protection of 1% of the populations seems to trump just about every other minority, not to mention the rights of the 50% plus who are female.”
READ MORE: Why is a trans minority being pandered to by the Scottish Government?
This is surely the nub of the question – nobody is denying trans people should be protected but not at the expense of 50% of the population. Once you start to deny someone born as a woman or indeed as a man exists you deny biology, science and every sexual concept known.
Amazing people like Joanna Cherry and Joan McAlpine have suffered grievously because they are willing to stand up and be counted – it is time all women stood up and were counted and stood behind the brave women like Joanna, Joan, Ruth Wishart and Johann Lamont.
Women will not weesht for indy or anything else.
Winifred McCartney
Paisley
IS the elephant in the room really trans rights, or whether trans rights is more important than independence? I am a believer in treating all with dignity and equity, yet this issue seems to have devolved to tribal levels and grown to biblical proportions.
I’ve seen many previous SNP members stating that they have left due to the SNP’s position on trans rights/feminism. Yet we will only really have a say on anything in Scotland if we can achieve our own independence.
It would be truly counter-productive to take our eye off the ball and throw away our focus on independence over an argument about the details of trans rights and the impact on feminism.
Susan Gearing
via thenational.scot
WHAT I find disappointing in these debates (not from Ruth’s piece, I must add) is the emphasis on various groups’ rights but not their responsibilities to their fellow citizens. In an independent Scotland I would like to see a citizen’s charter that clearly sets these rights and responsibilities out.
I would suggest the extremists on both sides of the transgender debate should take responsibility for making their points with calm, reasoned argument. And I am disappointed that by asking for clarification on the points made by both sides, I have received aggressive and irrational criticism from the trans “activists”, when until then I had no particular preference for the arguments of either side!
Mary Brown
via thenational.scot
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here