FORMER first minister Henry McLeish’s contributions to the debate on Scottish independence are usually interesting, even if he always falls short of giving his full support for it, whilst contemplating a dubious and woolly devo-max system carved in his own image. Like many other traditional Labour Party devotees, Mr McLeish, it seems, would like to debate alternatives to independence before grasping the nettle of full Scottish autonomy.
Though I respect his cautious approach, he should really consider that the people of Scotland cannot be tied any longer to a Union that is bent on self-destruction and plunging into an economic, social and political abyss.
READ MORE: Former Labour First Minister Henry McLeish says he would support independence
The present Conservative government with its mendacious buffoon of a Prime Minister and assorted charlatans is part of the case for a blessed release from the United Kingdom as soon as is practicable.
The many and varied hazards of a reckless and ideologically driven Brexit policy will afflict the UK economy for a generation at least. The libertarian drive towards a deregulated economy will witness an increased dilution in workers’ rights and a Conservative party motivated by a credo of social Darwinism will deliberately oversee the dismantling of the welfare state.
The internal market bill will cripple devolved parliaments and leave Scotland politically emasculated and, with the Labour Party lurching from crisis to crisis, at the mercy of successive Tory governments for the foreseeable future. By attaining independence we can reliably inform Mr McLeish that we would leave the antiquated first past the post electoral system far behind us, dump the anachronistic House of Lords and its freeloading inhabitants, and unceremoniously discard the monarchy, the ridiculous honours system and the selfish cronyism therein.
We could pursue a more ethical foreign policy and welfare system, remove nuclear weapons from Scottish soil, embark on a written constitution and examine the dream of a genuinely free press. In addition we can embrace our natural wealth and live the green dream, whilst applying for membership of the EU or EFTA. It’s never too late to commit Henry. What about it?
Owen Kelly
Stirling
WHAT do Sir Keir Starmer and Boris Johnson have in common? They personify the stagnant, dead end of the GB/ UK state. Two of a kind United in utter incompetence.
Boris Johnson has just U-turned yet again in the face of impending chaos self inflicted. Tory Brexit has been a disaster, compounded by incompetence across the whole Cabinet from top to bottom and lack of integrity. It was built on lies.
Sir Keir Starmer has no entitlement to representing Scotland as Labour only has one MP from Scotland, is equally hapless, perhaps even more so than Boris Johnson.
He has had open goals where he could have attacked, at this juncture he has been shown to be out of his depth, a bit mute in the face of the government’s self-inflicted bungling. But Sir Keir voted through the EU bill, too afraid to counter it. He too has shown his total lack of feel.
The idiocy and verbal buffoonery displayed by Boris Johnson in New York was an opportunity for Sir Keir to rise to the occasion, but no! His proposal to end one member one vote prior to Labour’s conference was a blunder and he has had to U-turn! He has angered his party. How long can the Tories thole Johnson after the latest U-turn on short term visas?
Two weak “leaders” in the English duopoly mirror the start of the end game in this Union. When one also factors in the antics of certain members of the Windsor dynasty, Andrew and Charles, then Britannia is truly keeling over in the waves, holed below the waterline.
John Edgar
Kilmaurs
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel