As the COP26 conference comes to a close, it's clear that the boosterism and promises of Boris Johnson and the British Government are not going to be delivered – not that this comes as a surprise to anyone who has paid even passing attention to the life and career of Boris Johnson. A man who styles himself after an abandoned sofa which has been doused in petrol, set on fire and fly-tipped in a nature preserve was never going to go down in history as the climate change hero who reached a deal to halt decades of environmental damage.
The second version of the draft agreement hammered out in Glasgow has been heavily criticised by environmental groups and campaigners for going backwards, after it watered down certain key commitments on phasing out of coal and fossil fuel subsidies which had appeared in the first draft.
The new draft now merely urges parties to "accelerate the development, deployment and dissemination of technologies, and the adoption of policies, to transition towards low-emission energy systems, including by rapidly scaling up clean power generation and accelerating the phasing-out of unabated coal power and of inefficient subsidies for fossil fuels". Critics have pointed out that this language still provides for subsidies for the fossil fuel industry as long as they are "efficient", as if such a thing exists.
The British Government was one of the G8 members who in 2009 committed to phasing out fossil fuel subsidies. It has now gone back on its word, to the surprise of no one in Scotland. Just last week Scotland Secretary Alister Jack insisted that the controversial development of the Cambo oil field off the west coast of Shetland should go ahead, saying that Scotland "can't run away from oil and gas", and added, "100% we need to keep backing oil and gas".
While the international standing of the UK, already battered and bruised by Brexit, will only have been damaged even further by the British Government's handling of the COP26 conference, the reputation of Scotland, which Johnson, Jack and their cronies went to great lengths to ensure was deprived of any representation at COP26 in its own right, has been considerably enhanced.
The planet is the big loser from the failure of COP26 to make a significant breakthrough, but ironically the political winner is the Scottish Government which was deprived of agency at a conference which revolved around the need for people to have agency if the most damaging effects of climate change are to be avoided.
Although the topic of Scottish independence was not officially on the agenda, all those attending COP knew that the Scottish Government seeks independence for Scotland, in part because independence is needed for Scotland to make a full and active contribution to the fight against climate change. Delegates could see for themselves that an independent Scotland would be an honest and co-operative partner with other nations in a way which the serial liar Johnson and his government of treaty-breaking and British exceptionalism is incapable of being.
Sturgeon expertly wielded Scotland's soft power and has gone a long way towards ensuring that when the second independence referendum comes around, the international community will look far more favourably on the prospect of an independent Scotland than it did in 2014.
This piece is an extract from today's REAL Scottish Politics newsletter, which is emailed out at 7pm every weekday with a round-up of the day's top stories and exclusive analysis from the Wee Ginger Dug.
To receive our full newsletter including this analysis straight to your email inbox, click here and tick the box for the REAL Scottish Politics
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel