THE whiff of Tory sleaze, decay and arrogance is all around. Boris Johnson is clearly revealed as the chancer politician everyone knew he was. But while the air is full of scandal much is passed off as caused by Johnson alone or by a few badly behaved Tories, the problem is much deeper.
British Toryism has always had a contempt for the people. Until Johnson, they were rather good at hiding it, while talking in private and showing through their actions their deep-seated revulsion at the people of the country they profess to love.
Firstly, take the current scale of Tory corruption and entitlement. Tory MPs complain that they cannot be expected to live on £82,000 per year (plus expenses and perks). Johnson says he cannot manage on his £161,000 Prime Minister’s salary.
There is a significant divide in the Tory Party on this. Party grandees elected pre-2010 to safe Tory seats think they have a right to supplement their MP salary with “second jobs”. Tory MPs elected in 2019 in “Red Wall” seats won from Labour tend to take a view informed by £82,000 being nearly three times median earnings and more than most people earn in their constituency.
READ MORE: Poll reveals what UK voters really think about sleaze in the Conservative Party
Secondly, new fissures are opening up between pre-2010 and post-2010 MPs, between those with large and small Tory majorities – and how the party sees Johnson. There are very few Johnson true believers, and the nature of him winning the 2019 leadership was for many transactional. Tory MPs reached out to him as an electoral winner out of desperation and this has held together his leadership until now – rather like Tony Blair and New Labour at its peak. Once Johnson’s star finally becomes extinguished, so will his base with Tory MPs.
Thirdly, Johnson’s political antenna failed in trying to save Owen Paterson and scrap existing parliamentary standards, and being unable to say “sorry”. To say that the UK is “not a corrupt country” out loud to the world’s media is politically disastrous, as 80% of the UK public think the UK is corrupt – with 12% having doubts and a mere 1% completely disagreeing.
The inner world of Toryism is filled with disdain for the everyday folk of Britain that the party makes a great play of caring about. This is often revealed in the private thoughts of Tories in the diaries many take delight in publishing.
Take Sasha Swire, married to Tory MP Hugo Swire, a lowly minister in the David Cameron years. Despite this the Swires were in the inner circle of the Cameron-Osborne set and well-positioned to portray it, which Sasha did in her recent diaries.
What a picture it is of arrogance and cluelessness about the vast majority of people of the UK. Sasha Swire cannot even stand their own East Devon Tory association, writing: “They hate in, equal measure: foreigners, Europe, defence cuts, gay marriage, Liberals, the BBC, Germans, the Japanese, the coalition and garlic.”
Alan Duncan’s diaries – In The Thick Of It – show that for a certain kind of politician all that matters is advancement and a cabinet post above everything. When the defence secretary post became vacant in 2019 he was “passed over” as “scheming triumphed over loyalty and suitability”, with the “ludicrously unqualified” Gavin Williamson getting the job.
Alan Clark’s Diaries might be remembered fondly by many but they show a man who was racist and sexist, and an open admirer of Hitler who said long after the Second World War and the Holocaust that: “I was a Nazi; I really believed it to be the ideal system.”
One of the literary sensations of 2021 has been the publication of the first two of three unexpurgated volumes of diaries from Henry “Chips” Channon – Tory MP for Southend from 1935-58, a heavily censored version having been published in 1967.
READ MORE: Call for investigation into 'co-ordinated Tory attack' on sleaze watchdog
Channon came from an Anglo-American family, made little impact on public life and never rose above the level of parliamentary under-secretary to Rab Butler in the Foreign Office.
But he had wealth, social contacts and a desire to hobnob with the rich and famous. His diaries reveal a rich swathe of upper crust Tory England in the 1930s and 1940s. Channon pre-war was a slavish supporter of Neville Chamberlain, appeasement, and sympathetic to the Nazi. He champions Edward VIII and Wallis Simpson before abdication, detests Churchill and is antisemitic.
The scale of prejudice along with wrongheaded judgment is staggering. Chamberlain is “the greatest man of all-time” and Churchill “a half-breed American”, while in a 1936 tour of Nazi Germany he was shown a censored version of a labour camp and approved, stating: “England could learn many a lesson from Nazi Germany.”
He was given red-carpet treatment by senior Nazis and talked with admiration of Goring, Ribbentrop and Goebbels, describing Hitler as “amiable” and “semi-divine”. His view of the triumph of Franco and fascism in the Spanish Civil War aided by Hitler and Mussolini is that “Germany is fighting our battles” against communism.
As war approached, Chamberlain was humiliated by Hitler after Munich and the dismemberment of Czechoslovakia, Channon writing in May 1939 that “all my sympathies” are with Hitler and that the press had been unfair to the Nazis.
READ MORE: David Pratt: Tory sleaze has paid off for them, it must pay off for independence
Today the Tories look a different beast from the past. There is no longer an empire but imperial delusions linger and there is still contempt for foreigners, immigrants, Europe and the poor. And, as critically, the Tory counter-story to previous failings, which saw the likes of Harold Macmillan prioritise building council houses and show sympathy the working classes in the 1950s, has long gone.
Boris Johnson’s troubles and problems with truth and accountability are not some sideshow. Geoffrey Cox’s actions as an absentee MP and lack of care for his constituents is part of the raison d’etre of Toryism; a disdain for the codes and practices of civility, care and compassion and the connections that make a society. Toryism has been laid bare, a truth that was always there but cloaked in secrecy – and for that Boris Johnson has inadvertently done all of us a service.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel