WHO remembers Sir Anthony Meyer?
The former soldier, diplomat and politician died in 2004, remembered really for only one thing – he was Margaret Thatcher’s "stalking horse".
By definition a stalking horse is a real or artificial horse behind which a hunter approaches its prey. In British political terms it means a person, usually a backbench MP, who challenges the leader of his or her party so that the real contenders can then step in to the leadership contest.
Meyer did his job well back when the very pro-European MP for a Welsh constituency decided to try and smelt the Iron Lady. He needed only proposer and seconder and got them – the contest was on.
In an editorial tribute to him, the Guardian noted what happened: “Sir Anthony’s campaign only attracted 33 votes, but another 24 ballot papers were spoiled. By this act of defiance, a significant fraction of the party broke through the carapace of invincibility that had surrounded their leader since her third election victory in 1987. Sadly for Sir Anthony, no more serious candidate – specifically, his friend and fellow wet Sir Ian Gilmour – took the opportunity of hiding themselves in his shadow in true stalking horse tradition ("The wets were truly wet," he was said to have lamented) and it took another year for a viable challenge to be mounted.”
READ MORE: This 30-second Nadine Dorries clip shows everything wrong with the Tory Cabinet
No wonder the wets stayed wet – the incredible vehemence directed against Meyer by the pro-Thatcher press was vile even by their standards, and included the exposition of the MPs long affair with a singer and model.
That second challenge came from Michael Heseltine and when she failed to finish him off at the first vote, Thatcher resigned and cried her way out of Downing Street, turning her team towards John Major who duly became PM.
The Guardian noted: “It takes guts to be a stalking horse, as the failure of even a single Labour MP to challenge Gordon Brown latterly proved in comparable circumstances. Sir Anthony was deselected as a candidate two months after his challenge.”
It says everything about Boris Johnson’s perceived weakness as Prime Minister and leader of the Conservative Party that he could soon be facing a stalking horse who would challenge his leadership to set up a contest that would be joined by the real wannabees in the party. They will deny it but Dominic Raab, Rishi Sunak and Priti Patel have that “lean and hungry look” which Shakespeare ascribed to the politically ambitious.
Now this may seem like wishful thinking on the part of his many opponents, but as The National reported, several MPs from his party have composed letters of no confidence in him.
The Mirror quoted one source: “There have been meetings going on in Portcullis House where there is gaming as to how he could be got rid of, not yet ready for a stalking horse situation unless we start to see further erosion in polls.”
READ MORE: Lorraine Kelly in scathing takedown of Boris Johnson after gaffe-ridden speech
It would take some organising as no fewer than 54 MPs would have to write to Sir Graham Brady, the chair of the 1922 committee of Tory backbenchers, requesting a leadership contest – the 22s changed the rules after their Blessed Margaret wept.
But who would be the Stalking Horse? The Joukers has two suggestions. They are both Scottish and therefore expendable. They are also ambitious and might just fancy getting a higher profile. Step forward Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross and the party’s former vice-chair Andrew Bowie.
Neither are going far at the moment, and wouldn’t be much missed if their stalking failed.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel