IT'S well known that Boris Johnson has a casual disregard for the laws, norms and standards of behaviour which apply to everyone else.
Just in the course of the past couple of weeks we have seen him ignore the mask mandate while on an official visit to a hospital, where he seemed to think it's OK to cough on health workers and vulnerable patients as long as it's him who's doing it. Possibly Johnson believes that old Etonian and Oxford-educated germs are far too rarified to infect common people. More likely he just doesn't care about anyone except himself.
Following that episode and the furore and public anger it generated, Johnson demonstrated that he had learned nothing and still didn't care by refusing to wear a mask while attending a London theatre for a performance of a Shakespearean play. The bard didn't actually write a play entitled The Twelfth Night That Thou Hast Forsaken A Face Masque, but if he had done it would have been about a selfish and self-regarding tyrant who didn't care about infecting his subjects during an outbreak of the plague.
We are currently having our collective intelligence insulted as Downing Street both refuses to deny that Johnson held a staff Christmas party at a time when Covid regulations expressly forbade it, and insists that no rules were broken. As always Johnson approaches every rule and law as though at the bottom of the page it contained a proviso written in invisible ink saying: “Does not apply to Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson if he finds it inconvenient.”
Such a proviso is of course entirely imaginary, and exists solely in Boris Johnson's head. However, in a show of shamelessness which is breathtaking even by the standards of a government which lied to the head of state in order to get Parliament unlawfully prorogued in an attempt to avoid scrutiny of Johnson's Brexit deal, Johnson has now announced a plan to insert an actual proviso in black and white in the real world which would allow him and his ministers to ignore any court ruling which they found inconvenient.
Johnson has ordered Justice Secretary Dominic Raab to toughen plans to reform judges’ powers to rule on the legality of ministerial decisions via judicial reviews. According to reports, Johnson wants MPs to pass an annual "Interpretation Bill" which would allow ministers to strike out findings from judicial reviews with which the government does not agree. It is a shocking development which would effectively neuter the ability of the courts to hold the Government to account and to ensure it acted within the law. What Johnson is proposing is that he is given the power to change the law retrospectively.
Even if the courts did rule that Johnson or his ministers had acted unlawfully, he would just nullify the court ruling. This plan gives Johnson a literal Get Out of Jail Free card. This is an extremely alarming development in a state like the UK where there is no written constitution and only a weakly protected separation of powers. It is no exaggeration to say that this is the sort of behaviour to be expected of an autocrat, not the prime minister of a democracy.
Together with the Conservative plan to introduce voter suppression tactics in their Elections Bill, and the reports that the Johnson regime is seeking to scrap the Human Rights Act, it's a further worrying sign that democracy can no longer be said to be secure in the UK. The UK is en route to becoming a banana republic without the republic and without the bananas, just empty supermarket shelves and exhortations to back Britain and back Brexit.
This piece is an extract from today's REAL Scottish Politics newsletter, which is emailed out at 7pm every weekday with a round-up of the day's top stories and exclusive analysis from the Wee Ginger Dug.
To receive our full newsletter including this analysis straight to your email inbox, click here and tick the box for the REAL Scottish Politics
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel