THE nation will be forever grateful for the selfless heroics of the NHS staff we all relied upon during the pandemic.
But now our cherished NHS faces a deeply uncertain future because of increasing US-style private healthcare.
The Tories, of course, deny it – but scratch the surface and you find overwhelming evidence of their true intentions.
For example, in 2017, Boris Johnson’s former senior adviser Dominic Cummings claimed Michael Gove had wanted to privatise the NHS, Boris Johnson wished to charge people for health services and Iain Duncan Smith advocated moving to a social insurance system.
The reality is that Westminster Tories can and will put the NHS on the table in future post-Brexit trade deals – particularly with the US. The Tory Government could have passed a law that the NHS will be protected. But they did the opposite.
They voted to scrap an amendment to their Trade Bill which would have prevented any future trade deal from undermining or restricting the UK’s ability to provide “a comprehensive publicly-funded health service free at the point of delivery”.
If the Tories are not planning to open the NHS to private trade, why vote against a law that would rule it out?
READ MORE: Shona Robison: Young and old need protection from Westminster hammer blows
The British Medical Association has said “the NHS in England has been forced down a route of increased marketisation and privatisation”.
In Scotland, because of the Scottish Parliament, we’ve been able to resist this creeping privatisation.
But Boris Johnson has called devolution “a disaster”. Now his government has passed a law that gives ministers the power to open up the NHS to “market access principles”.
And even senior Tories are ringing the alarm bells. Their former prime minister John Major giving his view of the then Tory leaders in 2016 said: “The NHS is about as safe with them as a pet hamster would be with a hungry python.”
The risk to Scotland’s NHS increases every day Scotland remains under Westminster control.
This article was part of our eight-page independence special, with one million copies printed and distributed. Click here to find out more.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel