IT takes a special kind of carelessness for a political party to lose a seat that it has held for 200 years, but that's what happened to the de Pfeffel Johnson Christmas party in the North Shropshire by-election.
The former safe seat, which the Conservatives held at the last General Election with a near 23,000 majority, was taken by the LibDems with a swing of 34% - which allowed their candidate Helen Morgan to take the seat with a majority of close to 6000.
Their candidate's victory allowed senior LibDems to celebrate in the exact same way that Nicola Sturgeon celebrated in December 2019 when the SNP candidate Amy Callaghan took the East Dunbartonshire seat from LibDem leader Jo Swinson, for which the SNP leader was roundly condemned by a succession of po-faced LibDems. Not that I'm accusing the Alex Cole-Hamilton shaped void of a lack of class, oh no.
The by-election was called following the resignation of Conservative MP Owen Paterson, after he had been censured by Parliamentary authorities for inappropriate lobbying on behalf of companies which employed him.
Johnson's attempts to protect Paterson and neuter independent scrutiny of MPs' outside activities sparked off a succession of scandals involving allegations of corruption, conflict of interest, rule-breaking, and entitled behaviour which the party has been unable to move on from. Many of the allegations centre on the behaviour of the Prime Minister himself, who has been accused of ignoring lockdown restrictions on numerous occasions and of lying habitually.
READ MORE: Man investigating No 10 Christmas parties 'held Christmas parties', reports claim
The common thread running through all these allegations is the entrenched belief of senior Tories that they are not bound by the rules and norms of behaviour expected of everyone else, starting with the Prime Minister and running right through the party. The Tories chose Johnson as leader, not despite his manifest character flaws but because of them…
This piece is an extract from today’s REAL Scottish Politics newsletter, which is emailed out at 7pm every weekday with a round-up of the day's top stories and exclusive analysis from the Wee Ginger Dug.
To receive our full newsletter including this analysis straight to your email inbox, click here and tick the box for the REAL Scottish Politics
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here