In another installment from our Yessay series of the past year we look backwards from the future. It is Hogmanay 2039 and Dr Tim Rideout assesses 13 years of independence and the trials and successes of living in an uncertain world as a small, independent nation on the edge of Europe.
‘TIS Hogmanay 2039 and perhaps a good time to reflect on 20 tumultuous years; besides, I will be 78 in just five weeks. This last year saw the first men and women land on Mars under the auspices of the International Collaboration established in President Biden’s second term, but on the negative side the effects of climate change get worse, and the Netherlands had to abandon some parts of the Zuider Zee polders to the rising waters. Venice is protected for now behind a permanent concrete dam.
Scotland might be a bit warmer, but it is definitely wetter. The world is cooking but we still can’t manage a decent summer! But that is not why I am writing. Just a few weeks ago we celebrated our 13th Independence Day, but all good stories start at the beginning. Back in 2021 we were still dealing with the pandemic and the UK, with Scotland only slightly better, had almost the worst outcome anywhere. Then there was the Omicron variant which in early 2022 compounded the disaster as Boris Johnson and his demented libertarians denied everything as London’s hospitals stacked patients in the corridors.
Fortunately, the First Minister Nicola Sturgeon had finally realised the “Four Nations Approach” was a mug’s game, so Scotland stuck to strict restrictions. Those, and the fact that triple vaccination finally reached 95% of everyone over 12 in Scotland finally brought down the curtain on Omicron.
Not a lot seemed to be happening on the independence front until the surprise resignation of Sturgeon as First Minister in February 2022 changed everything. The UN Secretary General, who she had met at COP26, had asked if she could take charge of the new WHO special department to implement a $50 billion World Covid vaccination plan. Paid for by a compulsory levy on all the developed country UN members – something of a novelty when approved at the General Assembly with only the UK and US abstaining. In her statement she stated that the health of the world was a request she could not refuse, even if it meant that somebody else would have to take forward the plan for Scottish independence. There was an obvious contest between Angus Robertson and Joanna Cherry, but the outcome after two rounds of voting was something of a surprise. I can’t go crossing the timeline (think Star Trek!) by declaring names but suffice to say that the new leader established a Transition to Independence Commission and by bringing together many elements of the Yes movement there was in short order the detailed plan that had been so lacking after 2014.
READ MORE: Imagine a world where Scotland won the 2014 referendum
Finally, the SNP leadership declared that “the currency question” was solved – we would have our own Scottish Pound managed by the Scottish Reserve Bank as soon as we could manage it after Independence Day. Thanks to the efforts of the Scottish Currency Group there was a plan, which the Scottish Government took over. We would also need more than 35,000 new core civil servants for all the new Ministries and these would be spread around the 32 Council areas in proportion to population with at least a 20% bonus for remote or deprived areas.
In early 2022 the Covid Enquiry provided the opportunity for Michael Gove to complete what he had started and finally replace Johnson as UK Prime Minister. The rising tide of English Nationalism, so unwisely stoked by the Tories, turned out to have no place for “subsidy junky” Scotland and thus an independence referendum took place in September 2022. With a clear plan before the voters and an obviously hostile English electorate the result ended up being 64% for independence.
Without waiting for independence (the Statute of Westminster (1931) now applied to Scotland, meaning Westminster could only legislate with our written consent, while the List of Reserved Powers had been deleted from the Scotland Act (1998)), the new FM increased the Council Tax differential such that Band H paid 10 times Band A, meaning the Duke of Buccleuch was paying £20,000 on his stately home. Band A charges were reduced by 20% so the tax finally became slightly progressive.
Meanwhile, a proposed alteration to inheritance law was finally implemented requiring that any heritable property over 1000 acres had to be divided equally between all the children and not passed to the eldest son. That would be slow acting but would ensure the large estates would fragment.
As a Highlander, the new FM was well aware of rural issues, so steps were also taken to restrict second homes, Airbnb, and to require the release of land for house plots and new crofts. Swift changes to the tax system saw the Upper Earnings Limit on National Insurance abolished (which meant those on high incomes no longer paid only 2%), while all income (whether earned income, interest, dividends or capital gains) became taxed at the same rate.
Meanwhile terms for divorce were set out, so Scotland agreed to take over the State Pension (which became the Scottish Universal Pension), but none of the so-called UK national debt. It was really the UK national Savings when looked at from the other side of the double entry book-keeping. Faslane was leased to the UK for a maximum of five years so they could find a new location, at a fee of £50m per annum.
READ MORE: Let’s imagine the independent Scotland that could be – optimism is revolutionary
As the UK insisted on following the Continuing State model under the Vienna Conventions (1978 etc), that meant they took over the assets and liabilities other than what was in Scotland. The Scottish Government acquired new Embassy premises in more than 60 countries. With Faslane and the state pension sorted out there was little else to discuss other than technical procedures for passing citizenship records, HMRC and DVLA details, and National Insurance records to the Scottish Government.
Thus, at midnight on St Andrew’s Day 2024 Elizabeth I & II (getting it right for the first time!), complete with zimmer frame, presided over what could have been the largest fireworks ever seen as independence came into effect at midnight. Alister Jack, the suddenly ex-Secretary of State and MP, had to be taken home by aides as the VIP hospitality did its work and ensured he would have no memory, other than a nasty hangover, of the final lowering of the Union flag.
RESTORING a country to full independence requires both hard work and investment, and thus it proved with Scotland. Of course, we also had to take on full responsibility for addressing climate change, but that was addressed by the Green New Deal.
This was a massive S£10 billion per annum project to entirely remove carbon from the economy. We just electrified the last stretch of railway line (to Kyle of Lochalsh) last month, while the last gas boilers for central heating are due to be replaced in 2042. Other than a few classic cars all transport is now electric, the council-owned Lothian Transport model had gone nationwide in 2026 resulting in vastly improved bus services, and just four years ago the free public travel schemes for under 22s and over 60s were extended to everyone.
For me, the most exciting moment was the last weekend of January 2025. Four years of detailed preparation (it had been started before indyref2) came to fruition with the release into circulation of the Scottish Pound under the auspices of the Scottish Reserve Bank. Sterling notes and coins had almost vanished within two weeks and long before the one-to-one pegged period ended in April 2025. Over two years £180 billion of Sterling was exchanged into the S£, while S£120 billion went in the other direction to settle Sterling mortgages and loans.
At the end of the day the Scottish Reserve Bank ended up with £60 billion of Foreign Reserves (almost as much as the US$88 billion of UK reserves), with £45 billion of that being transferred to the Scottish Sovereign Wealth Fund (as proposed by former MP Douglas Chapman back in 2020).
Back in 2020 the Project Fear “speculators’ attack” on the S£ had been much promoted by the likes of These Islands (a defunct anti-independence lobby group), but that ended up as a tiny 1 pence wobble before more sensible investors started pushing up the new currency. In an over-heating and over-populated world how could anyone fail to recognise the advantages of a cool, wet (if we have to endure climate change, I still don’t see why we can’t have at least a few weeks of proper summer each year!), and fairly sparsely populated resource-rich country?
The Ministry of Energy was established in Aberdeen back in 2022 and took over the National Grid from Scottish Power/SSE. That was enhanced with a massive investment (funded by the Scottish National Investment Bank) in sub-sea interconnectors to Germany, the Benelux countries and France. Between wave, wind and tidal power we now provide 50% of German electricity needs. Just as well as the chaos in Russia after Putin’s death a few years ago abruptly severed the gas supply. Those who said we didn’t need oil and gas to fund independence were right as we are still the largest European domestic energy provider but on a permanent and sustainable basis.
WAS it all so easy? Actually no. The 2025 referendum on re-joining the EU was 70% in favour, but this was not so easy to achieve. We had adopted the “Norway” EEA/EFTA position as of Independence Day (which solved trade issues with Europe at the expense of Northern Ireland styles issues with rUK), but four years of Accession Negotiations failed to reach an acceptable outcome.
The Common Fisheries Policy remained, while it was joined by other issues such as 5% VAT on food, books and children’s clothes (as we had lost all the UK opt-outs). As with Norway we opted to be in the Single Market but to stay, for the time being, outside full membership. As I write we are in the middle of a national controversy in the run-up to the May referendum on the Monarchy. It was put off for years.
Finally, we have to decide whether to stick with King Charles and the House of Windsor (or Schleswig-Holstein-Saxe-Coburg-Gotha-von Battenberg if you are me) or have a President. This has rather split the nation between children and grandparents so we will have to see.
What has also been taxing the First Minister and the Parliament recently is the on-going climate change situation in the Tropics.
Huge storms and alternating droughts and floods and have been fast rendering many areas uninhabitable. Two years ago, the President of Malawi appealed to Scotland for assistance. The country was visited by David Livingstone in the 19th century, evangelised by the Church of Scotland, has the largest city named after Blantyre, and always retained links. They have asked if half the population could be relocated to Scotland, some 10 million people.
You don’t need me to tell you that set the racist fox loose among the liberal chickens, so we are still trying to decide whether as a nation we are prepared to follow our consciences or give way to darker feelings. Meanwhile screens are filled every day with the death and suffering across much of the tropical and near tropical lands.
It is 10 minutes to the “bells” and time to close – my favourite Kilchoman Glen Gorm is waiting after all. Does anyone regret Scottish independence? I have been told there is one person in the form of Sam Taylor, late These Islands CEO, who lost his pension plan. Other than that, not that I know of.
Even King Charles now spends June to September here as he says London is just unbearably hot (though the unkind say that is his own fault for refusing to have air-conditioning installed in Buck House).
Statistically the answer is probably best shown by the fact we have a 10-year backlog of applications for immigration permits. The rUK border has become a problem, but for us because of the numbers seeking to move north.
Oops, old age and time goes faster and faster! There is the first “bong” so Slàinte Mhath! And welcome to 2040. To Scotland! and our future in a very uncertain world.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel