THE controversy continues over awarding the highest rank of knighthood to former prime minister Tony Blair in the New Year's honours list. At the time of writing, more than 425,000 people have signed a petition on change.org (link here) demanding that his award of "Knight Companion of the Most Noble Order of the Garter" be rescinded.
There are a good many people in the UK who believe that the only thing Tony Blair should be awarded is a trip to the dock in the International Court of Justice in The Hague to be tried on war crimes and crimes against humanity for his part in fabricating the false evidence of weapons of mass destruction which was used to persuade the House of Commons to agree to British involvement in the invasion of Iraq in 2003.
READ MORE: Tony Blair looks set to keep knighthood ... as no-one knows how to take it off him
The Iraq Body Count Project estimates that between 185,000 and 210,000 Iraqi civilians have died as a result of the US-led invasion of Iraq – which was enthusiastically supported by Blair – between 2003 and 2020. Some estimates place the figure even higher. Between 2003 and 2005, the independent British- American group estimates that some 37% of the 24,000 Iraqi civilians who lost their lives during that period were directly killed by US and allied forces.
Further Iraqi civilian deaths resulted from the violence of armed groups such as ISIS, who were able to gain a foothold in the country due to the failure of Blair and his American allies to plan for Iraq's reconstruction after the destruction created by their eagerly sought invasion. Iraq has been mired in violence and chaos ever since president Bush and prime minister Blair decided to lie and cheat in order to secure the downfall of the dictator Saddam Hussein at any cost.
Since leaving office, Blair has hardly behaved any better, making millions of pounds from an advisory company he set up which courted controversial clients ranging from oil corporations to the authoritarian government of Kazakhstan, which has been accused of repeated human rights abuses. But then if you are prepared to lie in order to start a war in which perhaps as many as a quarter of a million people have died, then you're probably not going to be overly troubled by the imprisonment of journalists and the banning of opposition parties by a commercial client who is paying you a fortune.
Giving a high-profile and prestigious state award to such a highly divisive and controversial individual merely reinforces the impression that senior figures in the British establishment are beyond accountability, and that their behaviour will continue to be rewarded no matter how egregious or inappropriate, even when many believe that their misdeeds reach the standard of the most serious criminality.
Despite the many thousands who have signed the petition, it is unlikely that Blair will be stripped of the award. Speaker of the Commons Lindsay Hoyle defended giving Blair the knighthood, insisting that it was "the right thing to do".
Appointments as Knight of the Garter are made by the Queen without advice from the Prime Minister, and now Blair joins such other luminaries deemed by the Queen to merit such a high award, like Prince Andrew. The honour is granted for life, unless a Knight or Lady Companion offends against certain "points of reproach". These points of reproach do not apparently include starting a war on the basis of a lie. Or allegedly having sex with a sex-trafficked teenager, which Prince Andrew has been accused of and strongly denies.
It's further evidence that the Royal household is hopelessly out of touch with the people it purports to represent. In reality, it represents wealth, privilege and a lack of accountability or moral probity – so in that light, giving Blair a gong is entirely on-brand for the Windsors.
This piece is an extract from today’s REAL Scottish Politics newsletter, which is emailed out at 7pm every weekday with a round-up of the day's top stories and exclusive analysis from the Wee Ginger Dug.
To receive our full newsletter including this analysis straight to your email inbox, click here and tick the box for the REAL Scottish Politics
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel