THE coronation of King Charles III will take place on May 6, with millions expected to tune in to watch at least a part of the pomp and ceremony surrounding the occasion.
The liturgy, published by the Archbishop of Canterbury’s Lambeth Palace, spells out exactly what will happen during the service and when.
READ MORE: King to abhor 'great cry of allegiance' – despite helping create idea, friend claims
A host of hymns and anthems will be sung, including the national anthem “God Save the King”.
But will it contain the infamous verse – which Billy Connolly called “appalling” and “racist” – about having “rebellious Scots to crush”?
Here’s what we know about the national anthem and the King’s coronation.
Are Scots mentioned in the national anthem?
Around the Jacobite rising of 1745, a verse was penned and occasionally sung as part of the longer God Save the King anthem, which appeared in its current form at around the same time.
This controversial verse made mention of Field Marshal George Wade, who served as commander-in-chief of the British forces during the “Forty-five Rebellion”.
It goes: “Lord grant that Marshal Wade,
“May by thy mighty aid,
“Victory bring.
“May he sedition hush,
“And like a torrent rush,
“Rebellious Scots to crush,
“God Save the King."
There are many versions of God Save the King, and often the above verse is not included. At other times it has been included as the sixth and final verse, or somewhere in the middle.
At official events, only the first verse of the anthem tends to be sung. At the coronation of King Charles, only the first and final (sometimes fifth) verses are to be sung, according to the liturgy.
These go: “God save our gracious King!
“Long live our noble King!
“God save The King!
“Send him victorious,
“Happy and glorious,
“Long to reign over us,
“God save The King.
“Thy choicest gifts in store
“On him be pleased to pour,
“Long may he reign.
“May he defend our laws,
“And ever give us cause,
“To sing with heart and voice,
“God save The King.”
Have their been efforts to address the controversial Scots verse in the past?
While prime minister, Gordon Brown ordered a review of British citizenship conducted by former attorney general Peter Goldsmith, who suggested that the verse calling for "rebellious Scots" to be crushed should be rewritten.
Speaking in 2007, Goldsmith said: "Quite a number of people have raised the issue of the national anthem in a number of ways.
"I think the national anthem is an important part of our national tradition."
He added: "But the review is about different ways of sharing our tradition and national identity ...
READ MORE: Scots suggest songs the BBC should play instead of God Save the Queen
"What we have to look at is different ways of saying what it is that links the country together."
However, in 2010 it was confirmed that no changes would be made to the anthem.
The debate over the lyrics has been raging for decades, with Billy Connolly raising the question in the 1980s during his appearance on "An Audience With..." which attracted millions of viewers.
The comedian said of the anthem: "It's an appalling song, and it's racist. The fourth verse is all about Marshal Wade coming up to give us a belt in the mouth."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel