PRINCE Andrew will pay around £12 million to avoid a US court case in which he was accused of being a sexual predator.
Of this, around £10m will go to Giuffre’s charity, Victims Refuse Silence, which supports victims of sexual abuse.
Prince Andrew (above, left) denies both abusing Giuffre (above, middle) and ever knowing her.
READ MORE: Queen holds in-person audience day after Prince Andrew settles sexual assault lawsuit
This money is understood to be coming from the Queen’s coffers – leading to demands the Crown comes clean about where the money is coming from.
It appears £12m is the cost of avoiding a potentially damaging and expensive civil court case. But what could it buy for Scotland?
Healthcare
Based on the latest nurse pay scales, the salary for a Band 5 nurse in Scotland with two to four years’ experience is at least £28,049.
This means Prince Andrew could have paid for 427 vital healthcare workers, instead of avoiding a court case.
The cost of one year of a medicine course at Glasgow University is £1820, meaning Prince Andrew could have put 1318 Scots through five years of medical training.
READ MORE: Queen to 'help Prince Andrew pay £12m Virginia Giuffre settlement'
He could have funded the wages of 453 junior doctors in Scottish hospitals, on a starting salary of £26,462.
Education
Prince Andrew’s settlement was enough to cover a year’s pay for 436 probationary teachers in Scotland, based on a starting salary of £27,498.
It could have paid for 419 music instructors, who are paid £28,809 at the lowest end of the pay scale.
Or he could have funded the wages of 585 classroom assistants in Scottish schools – based on an average salary of £20,501.
Other
Prince Andrew could have paid for Police Scotland to pay the wages of 448 new constables on a starting salary of £26,737.
For £12m, Prince Andrew could have bought a small fish supper for every single homeless person in Britain (some 277,000 individuals, according to an estimate from Crisis) – NINE times over.
Based on the average cost of building a council house in Falkirk last year (£209,404), the Prince could have funded the construction of 57 new council homes.
READ MORE: The Prince's Foundation probed by Met Police over 'cash-for-honours'
Based on an average dual-fuel cost of £1455, you could pay the annual energy bills of 8247 households – that’s nearly enough to heat every home in Stornoway (8846 households as of 2011 census).
And lastly…
Unfortunately, Prince Andrew’s favourite chain of pizza parlours are not planning to create any more restaurants soon, so it was not possible to say how many Pizza Express branches one could open for £12m.
But, based on an initial investment cost of £130,000, he could open 92 new Pizza Huts across the UK.
What are people saying?
Royal finances expert and author David McClure said there is “enormous public interest” in the sum and the source of the funding being disclosed, saying: “I really think for once the royal family should come clean and say where the money came from.”
Labour’s Rachael Maskell, who represents York Central, repeated a call made last month, saying Andrew should give up his association with the city out of respect.
She said: “To demonstrate his seriousness in this endeavour, and his respect for those affected by abuse and the people of our city, I would ask that his first act of contrition is to confirm his support for the withdrawal of his ducal title.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel