I DON’T know where Boris Johnson gets the idea that independence is not going to happen. The only way it won’t happen is if he tries to stop any referendum taking place. That would prove just how two-faced
he is since he stood in Poland
last week and stated that every country has the right to decide
how they are governed and
should not be bullied by a bigger neighbour.
He was referring to Ukraine and its problems with Russia, but is seems that this right doesn’t apply to Scotland since he is the leader of the bigger neighbour next door who is bullying us.
As for him stating that we needed the might of the UK Treasury to survive Covid, that’s an outright lie. The only reason we needed the UK Treasury is because, under
the Scotland Act that gave us devolution, Scotland is not allowed to borrow more than £1.75 billion per annum, with a total cap on all borrowing of £3 billion.
If we were independent we could have done exactly the same as Westminster, which was to borrow from the Bank of England. Only we would have borrowed from the National Bank of Scotland and not the Bank of England. Every other small independent country did exactly the same so why not Scotland.
Following prompting by the SNP at that time, the House of Commons library sent a letter to Alex Salmond on August 21, 1998 (ref 98/8/56EP/rjt), in which they showed that
based on Scotland’s GDP per capita, an independent Scotland would occupy 7th place in the world’s wealth league. The UK occupies
17th place.
This information was taken from a blog by John Jappy, a former civil servant who was involved in UK budget preparation.
You can see his full blog at scotlandowntwofeet.blogspot.com
We certainly do not need support from the heavily indebted, (to the tune of £2 trillion), UK Treasury.
We could manage so much better on our own.
Charlie Kerr
Glenrothes
IVOR Telfer’s letter “Not just the rich, but the ‘comfortable’ must contribute more” (Feb 14) started with some harrowing examples of desperate struggles being encountered amidst the cost of living rises. Mr Telfer suggests we will have more progressive policies once independent in an effort to reduce the inequality gap.
I agree with this suggestion. However, we must recognise what is being done right now by a very progressive SNP government.
Since the SNP came to power
in 2007 we have seen massive
moves towards closing inequality in so many aspects of our health and wellbeing. With the abolition
of prescription charges (£9.35/item in England) doing away with the need to choose which prescribed item is most needed. Introduction
of baby boxes, giving each child
born in Scotland an equal start. Extension of free personal care regardless of age, increases to
carers allowance, bringing it in
line with basic job seekers
allowance. Mitigating measures
put in place regarding the bedroom tax.
These are just a few examples where the Scottish Government are tackling inequality. But the
real game changer affecting more than 100,000 children is the introduction of the Child Payment
in 2021, £10/wk, initially to
every child under six years old, rolled out in 2022 to include all under-16s.
It will be reaching approximately
half a million and in a matter of weeks, this payment will increase to £20/wk.
The Scottish Government has introduced seven new benefits since the establishment of Social Security Scotland, include the new Adult Disability Payment.
Like Ivor Telfer, I want to see
a more socially just society, a
society that reaches out and
asks “what can we do to assist you” rather than creating hoops to jump through and endless assessments.
Thankfully, the establishment of Social Security Scotland is challenging and delivering a whole new approach to what is a human right: social security.
Catriona C Clark
Falkirk
JUST watched a political broadcast for the English Labour
party, masquerading as a political broadcast for
the Scottish Labour
Party. When will they ever learn?
When will they begin to listen to their Scottish membership? Will they ever return to the post-war years? The timing is right, but I doubt if it will ever happen!
The great Clydesiders must be turning in their graves. Scottish Labour
clearly does not exist. We
don’t need the Proclaimers to remind us that “Scottish Labour is No More”.
Robin MacLean
Fort Augustus
THE piece on Monday on the Glencoe atrocity was excellent. If your readers wish to learn the aftermath, that was, if anything worse, they should read Glencoe by John Prebble.
Scotland the then sovereign nation was systematically subjected to 50-plus years of wanton revenge – inspired cruelty at the hands of a London government authorised by the Crown.
Neither acknowledgement nor apology has been made to Scotland.
John Hamilton
Bearsden
JUST a thought! Why not use the tainted cash on offer to invest in creating a modern passenger ferry route between Fife and Belgium/The Netherlands?
That way it could be put to the good by using it to prepare for our post-UK future!
Catriona Grigg
Embo
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel