THERE are many reasons why clear labels on our food and drink matter. They help us to make choices about the quality of food we are buying, and shows how far it has travelled to get to our plates – along with decisions about the kind of animal welfare and environmental standards we want to support.
The Scottish Beef Association (SBA) is increasingly concerned that food labelling is not fit for purpose and is allowing meat from other nations to come onto our tables “through the back door”.
“It is no wonder the customer is confused when you look at the current jumble of labelling. Country of origin, Scottish, British, and Red Tractor are plastered all over the packaging but there is little clarity about what these really mean,” says David Barron, an Aberdeenshire beef farmer and SBA chairman. He is one of a growing number of farmers concerned about the “smoke and mirrors” around food labelling, undermining the work which goes into Scottish farming.
“Scotch Beef PGI [Protected Geographic Indicator – the future of this important status is threatened by Brexit] is clear in that the animal has to be born, reared, and killed in Scotland. Red Tractor is far less stringent – livestock only have to be on a Red Tractor farm for the last 90 days of their lives. Then we have the use of fictitious names, such as ‘Boswell Farms’ in Tesco,” Barron adds.
READ MORE: Wine labelling ‘woefully inadequate’ experts warn amid lack of high sugar warnings
It is not hard to understand why Scotland’s farmers are fighting for clear food labelling. The Scottish Farm Assured scheme was the first of its kind in the world, and is recognised as being an industry exemplar. This full-life traceability is our standard, so it might be understandable that some, perhaps, fail to realise just how special and important it is. Across the Far East, where food safety failures can have catastrophic consequences, Scotland’s Farm Assured Scotch beef is highly prized.
During the horse meat scandal, which saw counterfeit meat end up on our supermarket shelves, the certainty provided by the Scotch brand saw an uptake in people choosing Scottish produce. Brexit trade deals mean our shop shelves could fill with meats of a lower standard than was allowed when we were part of the EU – and the chances are, we won’t even know it’s there, because as soon as meat is processed, place of origin rules change again.
“Once you add a dash of salt and pepper to a piece of beef, once you mince it or put it in a sauce, the provenance no longer has to be declared,” Barron says. “The whole labelling scheme has become a farce. Customers back local produce but for that continue, they have to know what they are buying.”
Stephen Hendry is head of labelling, standards and regulated products at Food Standards Scotland (FSS). He says: “FSS’s role is to help consumers in Scotland to make informed choices about what they buy and ensure that food is labelled and described accurately.
READ MORE: UK Government faces backlash over foie gras and fur import ban 'U-turn'
“Concerns have been raised with FSS about the clarity of country of origin labelling on meat and processed meat products and how these foods are presented in store. We’re considering how best to encourage businesses to provide clearer information for consumers.”
Food labelling is reserved to Westminster, so the Scottish Government can’t force supermarkets to label food and drink more clearly, but we cast a ballot every time we open our purses. Many of us have little choice in the produce we buy, either because of availability or because of price.
Using the freepost address to send clean packaging back to supermarket customer service departments, along with a letter explaining why we think they should do more to support Scotland’s farmers, sends a strong message of support.
It’s not about flags on food, it’s about keeping good food on our shelves. Food security is national security.
Ruth Watson is the founder of the Keep Scotland the Brand campaign
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel