The Wee Ginger Dug is off this week, so The Jouker will be filling in.
CHANCELLOR Rishi Sunak is giving us example after example of exactly how little he cares about struggling families.
The UK is set to be hit with an unprecedented cost of living crisis, exacerbated by the decisions taken by Boris Johnson’s government. Spiking energy prices mean many will be left choosing between eating and heating – others will be struggling to do either, such is the scale of the problem.
Given Sunak’s previous, obvious aspirations to lead the Tory Party, it would thus be sensible for him to offer some semblance of sympathy – lest people assume that his massive personal fortune has left him rather insensitive to the plight of those less well-off.
However, as a Tory minister, normal, human emotions such as empathy are less of a factor. Instead, we hear reports that the only tough decision he’s having to make is which of his many homes he’ll be holidaying at during the Easter recess of Westminster. We’re sure poverty will loosen its horrifying grip until Sunak has had some time to enjoy all California has to offer and the Commons is back in action.
Has he come out to rubbish these? Of course not. He's headed off to a £5m Santa Monica home instead.
Meanwhile, Sky News revealed that Sunak and his wife have donated more than £100,000 to Winchester College since becoming Chancellor.
He’s no doubt proud of being head boy of one of the most expensive private schools in the UK – and the money goes towards bursaries for children who would not be able to attend the £43,335-a-year institution without that aid.
A spokeswoman for Sunak said: “Rishi and his wife have donated to numerous charities and philanthropic causes for many years and will continue to do so.
"These donations are made to help fund scholarships for children who would not otherwise have the opportunity to go to Winchester."
A noble cause on the surface … but coming after the UK Government has axed support for so many of the most in need (remember the Universal Credit uplift?), and while the funding gap between private and public schools continues to grow under the Tories, it hasn’t been met with a positive reaction.
It doesn’t do much for the image of an out-of-touch Chancellor, does it? In fact, his image is so bad that even David Cameron’s former speechwriter thinks he’s a bit too much.
Writing in The Times, Clare Foges said: “As a conservative and celebrator of success it pains me to say so, but for top-rank politicians in Britain there is such a thing as being too rich. Specifically, Sunak is too wealthy to be prime minister.”
In other words, while enough of the British public is well able to tolerate a Boris-Johnson-level toff and a royal family that jumps from scandal to scandal, Sunak is SO wealthy that even ardent small-c conservatives realise it’s political poison to have him as PM.
Yet he’s good enough to be Chancellor, it seems. Let’s see how that pitch goes to voters seeing the full impact of the cost of living crisis ... especially when indyref2 rolls around.
This piece is an extract from today’s REAL Scottish Politics newsletter, which is emailed out at 7pm every weekday with a round-up of the day's top stories and exclusive analysis from the Wee Ginger Dug.
To receive our full newsletter including this analysis straight to your email inbox, click here and tick the box for the REAL Scottish Politics
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel