IT is striking to note the spurious argument that because there is war in Ukraine this means that the Prime Minister should remain in office and not be replaced.
This is a man who has broken the law, the first Prime Minister in office to do this, as well as lying to parliament. History highlights that on numerous occasions we have replaced the Prime Minister in wars we have been directly involved in.
For instance, in May 1940 Neville Chamberlain resigned after the failure of British efforts to liberate Norway. In December 1916, at the height of the First World War, Lloyd George replaced Herbert Asquith. More recently, Mrs Thatcher resigned in November 1990, with Iraq invading Kuwait in August of that year, which led to the Gulf War.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: Douglas Ross using Ukraine to defend Johnson is 'lowest of the low'
Add to this changes to Prime Ministers during the war in Afghanistan, the Second Boer War, the Second Opium War and the Crimean War. Changing a Prime Minister in a time of conflict is clearly not unprecedented.
Those who make the law cannot be seen to be breaking the law and it is scarcely credible that Mr Johnson, who has now lost the final fragments of any moral authority he did have, can carry the confidence of the country and remain in office.
Alex Orr
Edinburgh
I HAVE squirmed repeatedly as Unionists defend Boris Johnson on the grounds that an illegal party is trivial compared with the bloody war in Ukraine.
Firstly, the whole mechanism of government will be available to deal with the ramifications of the war, and the PM’s part is comparatively minor, in fact given Johnson’s legendary laziness and lack of preparation it’s probably negligible. But secondly, and far more importantly, the Tory drinks parties were not victimless crimes as has been implied.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross denies 'cynically using Ukraine' to defend law-breaking Boris Johnson
An ordinary member of the public, breaking the rules, risks harming and maybe causing the deaths of a few acquaintances. A senior politician breaking the rules risks much more: a public loss of belief, replaced by nihilism, and ultimately a large amount of avoidable mortality and morbidity. It’s a crime of reckless endangerment of millions of people.
Derek Ball
Bearsden
WHAT a dreadful shambles – that is Westminster. The odious Boris Johnson supported by his dumb and dumber Scottish rep Douglas Dross.
Johnson has lied, misled parliament, broken the ministerial code, the first PM in office to break the law, he is at the root of the cronyism and PPE scandal that has lined the pockets of his millionaire buddies.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross 'destroys credibility' with car crash BBC Scotland interview
The cost-of-living crisis is in the large part due to him and his business vultures who put themselves and their wealth first and enforced Brexit on Scotland.
Johnson’s MPs are standing by him – but that does not mean that our SNP MPs need to join the eejits – they should stand up for Scotland and refuse to work with him. Come home and let’s start the campaign for our self-determination – our independence. Scotland deserves better than being dominated by a bunch of self-serving numpties.
Jan Ferrie
Ayrshire
WHY are individuals and the the media overlooking the fact that Johnson lied to parliament – which, when exposed, calls for an automatic resignation of the perpetrator? Shouldn’t the Speaker be taking action to implement parliamentary standards?
Douglas Ross claiming that Johnson’s presence is essential while the war is raging in the Ukraine is nonsense. Surely a party with an 80-seat majority could find a better replacement, even one who doesn’t tell porkies. Johnson’s handling of the run-up to the war did nothing to enhance his attempt at statesmanship.
Mike Underwood
Linlithgow
SO here we have D Ross, who on the basis of what were then merely allegations publicly called for Johnson to resign or be sacked. Now with actual guilt being found and confirmed by Johnson, D Ross says Johnson must stay because of Ukraine. At first the logic of this was beyond me, then I saw his logic!
Clearly when dealing with a pathological lying populist in the Kremlin, the UK needs a lying populist (or two) in Downing Street!
The criminal and Unionist party are a disgrace let’s throw them out here in Scotland and let’s get Scotland out of the UK, which is run by pathological liars and now criminals!
Rab Doig
via email
THE widespread use of the name BOZO almost sounds like a term of endearment these days. Following Tuesday’s confirmation of party fines, may I suggest the name is henceforth changed to BOOZO? At least, being more apt, it can’t easily be misconstrued.
Bruce Moglia
Bridge of Weir
DOUGLAS Ross suggesting this is not the time to remove a Prime Minister who has been found out only serves to promote Mr Ross’s cowardliness. It is not only the party that is over – political careers are hanging by a thread. Voters only have a short time to wait for the opportunity to give their verdict: the local elections are looming on May 5 and a clear message should be forthcoming.
Catriona C Clark
Falkirk
IF the lying Prime Minister will not resign, surely one of the Queen’s final acts should be to summon him to Buckingham Palace and insist that he resign to uphold longstanding protocols. Does this also mean that Ian Blackford can call him a liar in the House of Commons without fear of contradiction?
Steve Cunningham
Aberdeen
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel