VOTERS, eh? What are they like? You can give them all the information in the world about how to vote but yet they will still have the temerity to make up their own minds.
How many times have we seen a post-election scolding from unsuccessful candidates and parties berating an electorate for not doing as required?
The simple truth is that regardless of the quantity and quality of election literature put out by parties, voters have a pretty good idea of what they want, and that doesn’t always neatly align with parties’ expectations.
Over the weekend, postal votes started to go out for the council elections as we get down to the business end of this particular contest.
This is an election determined by the Single Transferable Vote (STV), a system designed to strike fear into the heart of even the most seasoned psephologist.
STV is just one of the four different types of electoral systems we use in Scotland, and for me, STV is perhaps the most elegant.
STV more or less delivers proportionality and it empowers voters in a way that other systems don’t by giving the ability to rank candidates according to preference.
The only thing is, it is incredibly complicated. As we know, to our cost in Perth and Kinross, the candidate with the most first-preference
votes doesn’t always get elected. That’s because each winning candidate has to reach a threshold determined by a formula dependent on the total number of votes cast divided by the number of available seats in the ward plus one. You keeping up ... ?
Don’t worry. I do this for a living, and I find it all incredibly difficult. The important point is that your vote has a value beyond your first preference.
Because of our multi-varied electoral environment, political parties keep their messaging as simple as possible to maximise their support. So, in the SNP, we would say “both votes SNP” or in the case of these elections “SNP 1 and 2” to avoid any chance of confusion.
This is the core message, and if we want voters to take one thing from all the competing demands, it is this. Anything more than four or five words might as well be War and Peace.
READ MORE: Local election votes only fully count if you use of all your options
In these elections most voters will vote for their party of choice and leave it at that, and that is absolutely fine. However, increasingly, voters want to use their vote intuitively with the intention of shaping the final outcome and damaging candidates and parties they don’t like. This is where “Vote Till You Boak” comes in. VTYB comes from STV-savvy Northern Ireland and helped nationalist parties deny Unionists a majority by ranking nationalist candidates at the top and Unionists at the bottom. Increasingly it is being adopted in Scotland.
HERE, the political spectrum for those of an SNP persuasion ranges from the SNP all the way down to the Tories. Our boak list would be a matter of placing parties in a descending order of increasing nausea until all are ranked.
“You’re not seriously asking us to vote for the Tories, are you Pete?” I hear you gently inquire?
The answer to that is a decisive “no”. What we are asking you to do is put them in last place.
If you only vote for your first preference then you remove yourself from the contests further down the line. You will have no say in whether a Tory gets in ahead of a less unpalatable independent, for example.
The top of the list is pretty straight forward – SNP 1 and 2, or maybe even 3. We will also give advice on how you can maximise the chances of getting all SNP candidates elected by suggesting a voting order.
How candidates are ranked after that will be a matter of individual preference (as long as the Tories are at the bottom, of course). In my case, after the SNP, I will vote for candidates who support independence and our government. So that will be the Greens, indy-supporting independents and maybe one of these small number of Labour candidates that back Yes.
Then I will vote for any fringe anti-SNP “indy-harming” independence candidates from parties such as Alba. On the nausea scale at this stage my stomach may well be starting to churn as I put a ranking next to parties who bring such damage and division to our cause.
I know many SNP voters will find it hard to rank Alba candidates after the tirades of abuse and disgusting things their activists say on social media about our First Minister, but it is important that you rank them before the Unionists.
Then we get to the full-on dry boak. On my list, I would have a look at the remaining independents, then Labour, then Liberal and then, with great pleasure, I will place the Tory in last place. Then I will reach for the liver salts…
We could well see a bumper turnout at these elections as many Scottish voters want to give the Tories an electoral kicking, following all the revelations about party gate.
Putting the Tories last in an STV election is as close as we get to being able to register a vote against them. So vote well and vote wisely. Most importantly Vote Till You Boak.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel