WITH Elon Musk looking to buy Twitter for a cool £34.5 billion, the SpaceX boss has committed to pursuing free speech on the platform.
The famous billionaire claims that Twitter needs to be “politically neutral” which he says “means upsetting the far right and the far left equally”.
With that in mind, let’s have a look at some of the banned profiles who might make it back onto the platform following the tech giant's takeover.
Wings Over Scotland (WOS)
WOS, real name Stuart Campbell, came to prominence as a Yes campaigner and author of the Wee Blue Book.
He was a prominent voice in the run-up to the 2014 independence referendum before he was banned from the site for "supposed hateful conduct".
In December 2019, Campbell waded into a spat between journalists Helen Lewis and Louis Staples. Staples accused Lewis of using an analysis piece to link Labour's poor electoral performance with the then Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn’s policies towards trans people.
Campbell entered the row by tweeting: “Sounds like you’re a c*** tbh”.
WOS argued that there was no ban on swearing on the platform and that his tweet did not mention any particular group. However, he was banned on the grounds of hateful conduct.
Speaking to The Scottish Sun, Campbell said: "That's entirely false. No other tweets were mentioned by Twitter - my account is regularly reported for malicious reasons, usually by trans-rights activists, but has always been found not to have violated any policies.”
Silvio Tattisconie
This high-profile Twitter troll was banned in October last year for attacking Scottish poet Len Pennie who would post a Scots word of the day along with a video of her own verse.
Known online as Miss PunniePennie, Pennie was subjected to a hate campaign following her appearance at Transpoesie 21, an EU-funded poetry event to celebrate linguistic diversity.
Hiding behind their anonymous nom de plume, Tattisconie used a misogynistic slur and attacked Pennie for publicly discussing her struggle with anxiety and depression.
He wrote: “Ohhh it’s my mental health, I get anxious, I can’t sleep, I’ve no one to talk to. Bulls***,”
He then called Pennie an “attention-seeking whore”.
Tattisconie, who had previously been retweeted by Donald Trump, was subsequently banned from the platform.
READ MORE: Five awful Tory laws MPs hope you'll forget now the term's over
Donald Trump
The former US president’s account was banned from Twitter for repeated violations of the site's rules. The final straw for the Republican came two days after the riot on Capitol Hill with Twitter citing a risk of “further incitement of violence” for his removal from the platform.
Following his ban, Trump said he didn’t intend to return to Twitter, preferring to stick with his rival social media site Truth Social.
It remains to be seen if Musk’s takeover would be enough to tempt the former president back to Twitter.
Katie Hopkins
Hopkins had her profile suspended in June 2020 after a string of far-right tweets caused widespread offence. One of those compared migrants to cockroaches while another claimed that a picture of a dead Syrian child on a beach had been staged.
In their statement on Hopkins’s ban, the social media site said that she had been removed from the site to “keep Twitter safe” and that “abuse and hateful conduct have no place on our service and we will continue to take action when our rules are broken”.
David Duke
The former leader of the Klu Klux Klan had his account banned from Twitter in 2020 for repeatedly breaching the site’s rules on hateful conduct. Duke’s account was suspended more than ten years after he first activated his account and more than eight years after he started regularly tweeting in 2012.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel