JUNE is going to be a big month for UK pensioners. A special day is planned that should bring a smile to thousands of faces and make the older people of these isles feel valued, respected and looked after by those in charge. Prepare to hang out the bunting and serve up cake … Pension Credit Day of Action is nearly upon us!
The big day has been planned by the Department for Work and Pensions after its statistics showed that as many as 850,000 families were missing out on this crucial benefit, which provides help with living costs and is a gateway to other forms of benefits and savings such as free TV licences, Warm Homes Discounts and council tax reductions. In the year 2019/20 a whopping £1.7 billion went unclaimed – just think what a difference that could make to the finances of the poorest pensioners.
Finally, you might be thinking, the Tories are doing something decent and humane. Benefits might be sitting at outrageously low levels amid a cost-of-living crisis but at least they are playing fair here, and making sure everyone gets what they are entitled to. Oh wait, did I say “everyone”? What I meant was “the demographic the Tories cynically calculate are most likely to vote for them”.
If your pen is poised to note down the date of the days of action that are to follow for disabled people, unemployed people, and those in in-work poverty, relax your wrist. There are none. If you’re hoping this is because those people are already claiming everything they are entitled to, dream on.
READ MORE: 'I had to re-mortgage my home': Waspi woman hit by double whammy amid cost of living crisis
We don’t actually know how many non-pensioners are under-claiming benefits, or failing to claim any at all, because the UK Government bean-counters have stopped counting them. It’s ingenious, really. If you stop measuring the under-claiming problem, no-one can get on your case about addressing it. And if you keep measuring over-claiming (ie benefit fraud), you can even give the impression that there might be a net over-claim; that these pesky benefit fraudsters with their bogus back injuries are bleeding the UK dry.
The opposition probably won’t prioritise talking about it, lest they give the impression that the benefits on offer are adequate and some people just lack the wit to claim them properly.
If you can’t quite believe the UK Government would have the audacity to stop measuring the vast majority of benefits take-up, and wish to consult the statistics section of their website, go ahead. There you will find a document titled “Income-related benefits: estimates of take-up: financial year 2019 to 2020”.
Looks promising, but ... surprise! It covers just two income-related benefits: pension credit, and housing benefit for pensioners. It’s like the DWP version of handing you a jar and asking you to open it, only for a snake to hit you in the face.
Amid all of the outrageous, offensive and alarming things the Tories have been getting up to over the past decade, the publication of a short statistical notice in January was never likely to grab headlines or inspire folk to take to the streets.
It read: “The change is: remove reporting on working age take-up from the next publication and focus only on pensioner age take-up. We will be ceasing publication of take-up rates for working age housing benefit and therefore restricting publication of take-up rates for housing benefit to pensioner age only. We will be ceasing publication of take-up rates for income support and income-related employment and support allowance.”
The justification for this is that a “complex methodology” is used to calculate take-up, and since the introduction of Universal Credit, well, meh, it’s too hard. How convenient. Following the news of this change, the folk at benefits calculator site entitledto.co.uk
noted that one of the main reasons the government gave for introducing Universal Credit was that it would help increase benefit take-up. As it stands, we have no way of knowing whether the people who failed to claim the “legacy benefits” to which they were once entitled are now claiming what they are due through Universal Credit instead.
READ MORE: One in five Scots out of money before payday, Citizens Advice Scotland poll shows
But that doesn’t seem very likely, even disregarding the information demands placed on claimants and lengthy delays built into the system.
In February the website published its annual estimate of total unclaimed benefits for 2019/20 (£15.5bn using one method of calculation, £13.5bn using another) but with significant caveats due to the data gaps. Less reliable figures mean the news value of this analysis decreases, and ultimately fewer people being prompted to check their entitlements.
A cynic might wonder if this is a deliberate ploy by a UK Government that’s happy to keep the cash and punish the poor. Some may still like to believe the likes of Tory MP Katherine Fletcher – who would rather tell those in in-work poverty to “get a better job” than suggest they check their entitlements – must be outliers, while the rest are “compassionate Conservatives” like Iain Duncan Smith.
But let’s not hold our breath for his call for a benefits hike to be heeded, or for any more “days of action” to be scheduled.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel